» Articles » PMID: 38732740

A Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Vs. Standard Materials Used in Orthodontic Fixed Appliances: A Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 May 11
PMID 38732740
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), an organic thermoplastic polymer, has gained interest in dentistry due to its excellent mechanical strength, flexibility, and biocompatibility. Furthermore, the ability to utilize CAD/CAM in the fabrication of PEEK enhances accuracy, reliability, and efficiency while also saving time. Hence, several orthodontic studies have explored the utilization of PEEK in various applications, such as archwires, brackets, fixed lingual retainers, palatal expansion devices, transpalatal arches, Tübingen palatal plates, different types of space maintainers, mini-implant insertion guides, and more. However, a complete systematic review of the available data comparing the performance of PEEK with traditional orthodontic materials has not yet been conducted. Therefore, this systematic review seeks to assess if PEEK material meets the required mechanical criteria to serve as an alternative to conventional orthodontic appliances. To ensure clarity and precision, this review will specifically concentrate on fixed appliances. This systemic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and utilized databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Springer, Web of Science, and Wiley. Searches were restricted to English language articles from January 2013 to February 2024. Keywords such as "Polyetheretherketone" or "PEEK" and "Orthodontic" or "Orthodontic device" or "Orthodontic materials" were employed across all databases. Nine studies were incorporated, covering orthodontic archwires, brackets, and fixed lingual retainers. Based on the reviewed literature, PEEK demonstrates promising potential in orthodontic fixed appliances, offering advantages in force delivery, friction reduction, and aesthetic appeal. Further research is needed to fully explore its capabilities and optimize its application in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Effect of Infill Density on the Mechanical Properties of Natural Peek Processed by Additive Manufacturing.

Vazquez-Silva E, Pintado-Pintado J, Moncayo-Matute F, Torres-Jara P, Moya-Loaiza D Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940549 PMC: 11820140. DOI: 10.3390/polym17030347.

References
1.
Meier B, Wiemer K, Miethke R . Invisalign--patient profiling. Analysis of a prospective survey. J Orofac Orthop. 2003; 64(5):352-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-003-0301-z. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Maekawa M, Kanno Z, Wada T, Hongo T, Doi H, Hanawa T . Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires made of super engineering plastic. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34(1):114-9. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2014-202. View

4.
Shaughnessy T, Proffit W, Samara S . Inadvertent tooth movement with fixed lingual retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016; 149(2):277-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.015. View

5.
Win P, Chen D, Sainbayar B, Peng T, Cheng J . Assessment of mechanical characteristics of polyetheretherketone as orthodontic fixed lingual retainers. J Dent Sci. 2023; 18(4):1804-1811. PMC: 10548050. DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.026. View