» Articles » PMID: 38732338

Quantitative 3D Analysis of Levator Ani Muscle Subdivisions in Nulliparous Women: MRI Feasibility Study

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 May 11
PMID 38732338
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The levator ani muscle (LAM) is crucial for pelvic floor stability, yet its quantitative MRI assessment is only a recent focus. Our study aims to standardize the quantitative analysis of the LAM morphology within the 3D Pelvic Inclination Correction System (3D-PICS).

Methods: We analyzed 35 static MR datasets from nulliparous women examining the pubovisceral (PVM), iliococcygeal (ICM), coccygeal (COC), and puborectal muscle (PRM). The PVM consists of three origin-insertion pairs, namely the puboanal (PAM), puboperineal (PPM) and pubovaginal muscle (PVaM). The analysis included a quantitative examination of the morphology of LAM, focusing on the median location (x/y/z) (x: anterior-posterior, y: superior-inferior, z: left-right) of the origin and insertion points (a), angles (b) and lengths (c) of LAM. Inter-rater reliability was calculated.

Results: Interindividual variations in 3D coordinates among muscle subdivisions were shown. In all, 93% of all origin and insertion points were found within an SD of <8 mm. Angles to the xz-plane range between -15.4° (right PRM) and 40.7° (left PAM). The PRM is the largest pelvic muscle in static MRI. The ICC indicated moderate-to-good agreement between raters.

Conclusions: The accurate morphometry of the LAM and its subdivisions, along with reliable inter-rater agreement, was demonstrated, enhancing the understanding of normal pelvic anatomy in young nulliparous women.

References
1.
Wyman A, Greene K, Bassaly R, Hahn L, Patton S, Miladinovic B . Levator Ani Muscle Defects in Patients With Surgical Failure. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017; 23(2):114-117. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000380. View

2.
Kataoka M, Kido A, Koyama T, Isoda H, Umeoka S, Tamai K . MRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: evaluation on high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25(3):527-34. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20842. View

3.
Chamie L, Ribeiro D, Caiado A, Warmbrand G, Serafini P . Translabial US and Dynamic MR Imaging of the Pelvic Floor: Normal Anatomy and Dysfunction. Radiographics. 2018; 38(1):287-308. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170055. View

4.
Betschart C, Kim J, Miller J, Ashton-Miller J, DeLancey J . Comparison of muscle fiber directions between different levator ani muscle subdivisions: in vivo MRI measurements in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 25(9):1263-8. PMC: 4140951. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2395-9. View

5.
Sammarco A, Sheyn D, Krantz T, Olivera C, Rodrigues A, Kobernik M . A novel measurement of pelvic floor cross-sectional area in older and younger women with and without prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221(5):521.e1-521.e7. PMC: 6829060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.001. View