» Articles » PMID: 38732306

Peroral Pancreatoscopy-Guided Lithotripsy Compared with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the Management of Pancreatic Duct Stones in Chronic Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 May 11
PMID 38732306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a common treatment for pancreatic stones in chronic pancreatitis. In contrast, peroral pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy (POPS-L) remains underexplored, with limited comparative studies to ESWL. This study compared the treatment outcomes of disposable POPS-L tools and ESWL for pancreatic stones.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 66 patients who had undergone pancreatic stone treatment at three institutions between 2006 and 2022. The treatment outcomes of POPS-L and ESWL were compared.

Results: This study included 19 and 47 patients who had undergone POPS-L and ESWL, respectively. In a comparison between POPS-L and ESWL, the stone clearance rates were 78.9% vs. 70.2% ( = 0.55), while the procedure-related complication rates were 21% vs. 6.3% ( = 0.09). The median total session counts were 1 vs. 5 ( < 0.01). The cumulative stone recurrence rates were comparable in both groups. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant factors influencing the stone clearance rates, and the choice between POPS-L and ESWL did not affect the stone clearance rates.

Conclusions: POPS-L and ESWL exhibited comparable treatment outcomes in terms of stone clearance, complications, and recurrence rates. Furthermore, POPS-L is advantageous due to the need for fewer sessions to achieve pancreatic stone clearance.

References
1.
Inui K, Masamune A, Igarashi Y, Ohara H, Tazuma S, Sugiyama M . Management of Pancreatolithiasis: A Nationwide Survey in Japan. Pancreas. 2018; 47(6):708-714. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001071. View

2.
Shimizu K, Ito T, Irisawa A, Ohtsuka T, Ohara H, Kanno A . Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for chronic pancreatitis 2021. J Gastroenterol. 2022; 57(10):709-724. PMC: 9522716. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-022-01911-6. View

3.
Cahen D, Gouma D, Nio Y, Rauws E, Boermeester M, Busch O . Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(7):676-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa060610. View

4.
Cahen D, Gouma D, Laramee P, Nio Y, Rauws E, Boermeester M . Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141(5):1690-5. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.049. View

5.
Bick B, Patel F, Easler J, Tong Y, Watkins J, McHenry L . A comparative study between single-operator pancreatoscopy with intraductal lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of large main pancreatic duct stones. Surg Endosc. 2021; 36(5):3217-3226. PMC: 10153763. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08631-7. View