» Articles » PMID: 38728263

The Effects of Co-designed Physical Activity Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 May 10
PMID 38728263
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) declines with age despite the knowledge that physical inactivity is a leading cause of disease, death, and disability worldwide. To better tailor PA interventions to older adults, researchers are turning to the collaborative principles of co-design. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of co-designed PA interventions and standard care for increasing PA and other health outcomes (i.e., physical function, quality of life, mental health, functional independence, attendance and attrition rates) in older adults.

Methods: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, AgeLine, CINAHL, Embase, and SPORTDiscus. Records were screened by independent pairs of reviewers. Primary research studies conducted among community-dwelling older adults (age 60+) comparing co-designed PA interventions to standard care were considered for inclusion. Controls included wait-list control, usual care, sham interventions, PA interventions without the use of co-design, and no intervention. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to report effect estimates. Quality of evidence was rated using GRADE.

Results: Of 16,191 studies screened, eight (N = 16,733) were included in this review. Most studies reported results favouring the effect of co-design on physical activity; however, only two studies (N = 433) could be pooled for meta-analysis resulting in a SMD of 0.28, (95% CI = -0.13 to 0.69; p = 0.19; I2 = 56%) immediately post-intervention. The GRADE quality of evidence was very low. The quantitative analysis of three studies reported improved physical function.

Conclusion: This review did not demonstrate that co-designed PA interventions are more effective than standard care for increasing PA in older adults; however, evidence was limited and of very low quality. Further well-designed trials are warranted to better understand the impacts of co-designed PA interventions and how to best implement them into practice.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022314217.

Citing Articles

How has co-design been used to address vaccine hesitancy globally? A systematic review.

Alpeza F, Avermark H, Gobbo E, Herzig van Wees S Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2431380.

PMID: 39660656 PMC: 11639369. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2431380.


"Balancing work and movement": barriers and enablers for being physically active at Indian workplaces - findings from SMART STEP trial.

Chandrasekaran B, Arumugam A, Pesola A, Rao C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):110.

PMID: 39334270 PMC: 11438046. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01661-z.


Exploring physical activity experiences of community-dwelling oldest-old adults with chronic multimorbidity: A qualitative study.

Lopez-Novis I, Marques-Sule E, Deka P, Dobarrio-Sanz I, Klompstra L, Hernandez-Padilla J J Adv Nurs. 2024; 81(4):1953-1965.

PMID: 39152567 PMC: 11896943. DOI: 10.1111/jan.16403.

References
1.
Seino S, Tomine Y, Nishi M, Hata T, Fujiwara Y, Shinkai S . Effectiveness of a community-wide intervention for population-level frailty and functional health in older adults: A 2-year cluster nonrandomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2021; 149:106620. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106620. View

2.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

3.
Lee I, Shiroma E, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S, Katzmarzyk P . Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):219-29. PMC: 3645500. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9. View

4.
Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C . A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014; 7(4):387-95. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0. View

5.
Viccaro L, Perera S, Studenski S . Is timed up and go better than gait speed in predicting health, function, and falls in older adults?. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011; 59(5):887-92. PMC: 3522463. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03336.x. View