» Articles » PMID: 38726223

Psychological Outcomes in Patients with Rare Cancers: A systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 10
PMID 38726223
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Rare cancers are those that exhibit an incidence of less than six per 100,000 in a year. On average, the five-year relative survival for patients with rare cancers is worse than those with common cancers. The traumatic experience of cancer can be further intensified in patients with rare cancers due to the limited clinical evidence and the lack of empirical evidence for informed decision-making. With rare cancers cumulatively accounting for up to 25% of all cancers, coupled with the rising burden of rare cancers on societies globally, it is necessary to determine the psychological outcomes of patients with rare cancers.

Methods: This PRISMA-adherent systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023475748) involved a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and PsycINFO for all peer-reviewed English language studies published since 2000 to 30th January 2024 that evaluated the prevalence, incidence and risk of depression, anxiety, suicide, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with rare cancers. Two independent reviewers appraised and extracted the summary data from published studies. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were used for primary analysis.

Findings: We included 32 studies with 57,470 patients with rare cancers. Meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant increased risk-ratio (RR) of depression (RR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.43-4.77, I2 = 97%) and anxiety (RR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.27-5.55, I2 = 92%) in patients with rare cancers compared to healthy controls. We identified a high suicide incidence (315 per 100,000 person-years, 95% CI: 162-609, I2 = 95%), prevalence of depression (17%, 95% CI: 14-22, I2 = 88%), anxiety (20%, 95% CI: 15-25, I2 = 96%) and PTSD (18%, 95% CI: 9-32, I2 = 25%). When compared to patients with common cancer types, suicide incidence, and PTSD prevalence were significantly higher in patients with rare cancers. Systematic review found that having advanced disease, chemotherapy treatment, lower income, and social status were risk factors for negative psychological outcomes.

Interpretation: We highlight the need for early identification of psychological maladjustment in patients with rare cancers. Additionally, studies to identify effective interventions are imperative.

Funding: This study was supported by the National Medical Research Council Transition Award, SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, the Khoo Pilot Collaborative Award, the National Medical Research Council Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant-New Investigator Grant, the Terry Fox Grant and the Khoo Bridge Funding Award.

Citing Articles

What do patients with a rare cancer living in rural, regional or remote areas and stakeholders want from a peer support program? A qualitative study.

Hemming L, Duijts S, Cockburn C, Wilson C, Yuen E, Spelten E BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):352.

PMID: 40001049 PMC: 11863523. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13782-0.


Suicide and Suicidal Ideation Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tan J, Ge G, Low C, Rana S, Tan T, Fang N JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2457544.

PMID: 39960673 PMC: 11833522. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57544.


Exercise Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Soong R, Low C, Ong V, Sim I, Lee C, Lee F JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2457859.

PMID: 39903465 PMC: 11795328. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57859.


Network analysis of fatigue symptoms in Chinese patients with advanced cancer.

Hu H, Zhao Y, Luo H, Hao Y, Wang P, Yu L Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2025; 12:100641.

PMID: 39886056 PMC: 11780119. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100641.


Comparing loss of contractual employment pre- and post-diagnosis in patients with rare versus common cancer types: a national registry-based study.

Zegers A, Motazedi E, de Heus E, Ho V, Coenen P, Tamminga S J Cancer Surviv. 2025; .

PMID: 39760980 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-024-01726-9.


References
1.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

2.
Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K . The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014; 3(3):123-8. PMC: 4154549. DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71. View

3.
Siracuse B, Gorgy G, Ruskin J, Beebe K . What is the Incidence of Suicide in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Cancer? : Suicide and Sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 475(5):1439-1445. PMC: 5384914. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5171-y. View

4.
Franzoi I, Granieri A, Sauta M, Agnesone M, Gonella M, Grimaldi C . The psychological impact of sarcoma on affected patients. Psychooncology. 2023; 32(12):1787-1797. DOI: 10.1002/pon.6240. View

5.
Mols F, Schoormans D, de Hingh I, Oerlemans S, Husson O . Symptoms of anxiety and depression among colorectal cancer survivors from the population-based, longitudinal PROFILES Registry: Prevalence, predictors, and impact on quality of life. Cancer. 2018; 124(12):2621-2628. PMC: 6033166. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31369. View