» Articles » PMID: 38724897

Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women Taking Oral Probiotic Undergoing Cerclage Compared to Placebo: Two Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 May 9
PMID 38724897
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oral probiotic effect on pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women undergoing cerclage compared to placebo.

Methods: This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial undertaken in Yasuj, Iran. 114 eligible participants who have undergone cerclage were randomly divided to either receive probiotic adjuvant or 17α-OHP (250 mg, IM) with placebo from the 16th -37th week of pregnancy by "block" randomization method. Our primary outcomes were preterm labor (PTB) (late and early) and secondary outcomes were other obstetrical and neonatal outcomes included preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM), mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes including anthropometric characterize and Apgar score (one and fifth-minute).

Results: Results show that there are no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of PTB in < 34th (15.51% vs. 17.86%; P = 0.73) and 34-37th weeks of pregnancy (8.7% vs. 16.1%; P = 0.22), and mode of delivery (P = 0.09). PPROM (8.7% vs. 28.5%; P = 0.006) PROM (10.3% vs. 25%; P = 0.04) was significantly lower in patients receiving probiotic adjuvant compared to the control group. After delivery, the findings of the present study showed that there were no significant differences in newborn's weight (3082.46 ± 521.8vs. 2983.89 ± 623.89), head circumstance (36.86 ± 1.53vs. 36.574 ± 1.52), height (45.4 ± 5.34 vs. 47.33 ± 4.92) and Apgar score in one (0.89 ± 0.03 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05) and five minutes (0.99 ± 0.03vs. 0.99 ± 0.03) after birth.

Conclusion: Our result has shown that the consumption of Lactofem probiotic from the 16th week until 37th of pregnancy can lead to a reduction of complications such as PPROM and PROM.

Citing Articles

Probiotics in the Prophylaxis of Premature Rupture of Membranes and Cervical Incompetence.

Vaduva C, Petrescu A, Dira L, Ruican D, Pana R Nutrients. 2024; 16(23).

PMID: 39683623 PMC: 11644756. DOI: 10.3390/nu16234230.


Probiotics for the Prevention of Vaginal Infections: A Systematic Review.

Zuniga Vinueza A Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64473.

PMID: 39135840 PMC: 11318795. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64473.

References
1.
Morelli L, Zonenenschain D, Del Piano M, Cognein P . Utilization of the intestinal tract as a delivery system for urogenital probiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004; 38(6 Suppl):S107-10. DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000128938.32835.98. View

2.
Shiffman R . Continuous low-dose antibiotics and cerclage for recurrent second-trimester pregnancy loss. J Reprod Med. 2000; 45(4):323-6. View

3.
Yang S, Reid G, Challis J, Kim S, Gloor G, Bocking A . Is there a role for probiotics in the prevention of preterm birth?. Front Immunol. 2015; 6:62. PMC: 4330906. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00062. View

4.
Lee J, Han J, Choi J, Ahn H, Lee S, Kim M . Pregnancy outcome after exposure to the probiotic Lactobacillus in early pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012; 32(3):227-9. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.641621. View

5.
Grev J, Berg M, Soll R . Maternal probiotic supplementation for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 12:CD012519. PMC: 6516999. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012519.pub2. View