Addressing Hidden Tensions and Grey Areas of General Practice: a Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Newly Qualified GPs Attending a Course on Generalist Medicine

Overview

Journal Br J Gen Pract

Specialty Public Health

Date 2024 May 9

PMID 38724185

Authors

Myriam DellOlio

Joanne Reeve

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Generalist approaches can help address several challenges facing today's primary care. However, GPs report insufficient support to deliver advanced generalist medicine (AGM) in daily practice, struggling within a healthcare system that imposes strict adherence to single-disease focused guidelines.

Aim: To examine the professional and educational experiences of newly qualified GPs attending a course on AGM to understand how to redesign primary care systems to support their generalist work.

Design And Setting: This was a qualitative study focusing on AGM in UK general practice (England), conducted in the context of the research evaluation of an online career development programme on AGM.

Method: We conducted 36 interviews and six focus groups with newly qualified GPs attending an online career development programme on AGM, and analysed data using framework analysis.

Results: Three tensions experienced by the participants were identified: tension between realistic and idealistic practice; tension between different decision-making paradigms; and tension in the formation of the GPs' professional identities. These were owing to grey areas of practice deeply rooted in primary care systems - namely areas of work not adequately addressed by current education and service design.

Conclusion: Our findings have implications for tackling the general practice workforce crisis, highlighting that solutions targeting individual problems will not suffice by themselves. By making visible the grey areas of everyday general practice, we describe the changes needed to target tensions as described by the GPs in this study to ultimately enable, enhance and make visible the complex work of generalist medicine.

References

Kontos P, Poland B . Mapping new theoretical and methodological terrain for knowledge translation: contributions from critical realism and the arts. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:1. PMC: 2639531. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-1. View

Kadandale S, Marten R, Dalglish S, Rajan D, Hipgrave D . Primary health care and the climate crisis. Bull World Health Organ. 2020; 98(11):818-820. PMC: 7607470. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.20.252882. View

May C, Mair F, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Dowrick C, Treweek S . Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:29. PMC: 2693517. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29. View

Al-Bedaery R, Rosenthal J, Protheroe J, Reeve J, Ibison J . Primary care in the world of integrated care systems: education and training for general practice. Future Healthc J. 2024; 10(3):253-258. PMC: 10753223. DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2023-0073. View

Brosemer K, Schelly C, Gagnon V, Arola K, Pearce J, Bessette D . The energy crises revealed by COVID: Intersections of Indigeneity, inequity, and health. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020; 68:101661. PMC: 7338883. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101661. View

Rowley J, Richards N, Carduff E, Gott M . The impact of poverty and deprivation at the end of life: a critical review. Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2021; 15:26323524211033873. PMC: 8442481. DOI: 10.1177/26323524211033873. View

Mathers N, Paynton D . Rhetoric and reality in person-centred care: introducing the House of Care framework. Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66(642):12-3. PMC: 4684003. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X683077. View

Rennie D . Qualitative research as methodical hermeneutics. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(3):385-98. DOI: 10.1037/a0029250. View

Ignatowicz A, Greenfield G, Pappas Y, Car J, Majeed A, Harris M . Achieving provider engagement: providers' perceptions of implementing and delivering integrated care. Qual Health Res. 2014; 24(12):1711-20. PMC: 4232313. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314549024. View

Quinlan E . The 'actualities' of knowledge work: an institutional ethnography of multi-disciplinary primary health care teams. Sociol Health Illn. 2009; 31(5):625-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01167.x. View

10.

Wenzel R . Medical Education in the Era of Alternative Facts. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(7):607-609. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1706528. View

11.

Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes R, Richardson W . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996; 312(7023):71-2. PMC: 2349778. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. View

12.

Chew-Graham C, Hunter C, Langer S, Stenhoff A, Drinkwater J, Guthrie E . How QOF is shaping primary care review consultations: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2013; 14:103. PMC: 3726490. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-103. View

13.

Gabbay J, le May A, Pope C, Brangan E, Cameron A, Klein J . Uncovering the processes of knowledge transformation: the example of local evidence-informed policy-making in United Kingdom healthcare. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020; 18(1):110. PMC: 7520955. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00587-9. View

14.

Donner-Banzhoff N, Hertwig R . Inductive foraging: improving the diagnostic yield of primary care consultations. Eur J Gen Pract. 2013; 20(1):69-73. DOI: 10.3109/13814788.2013.805197. View

15.

Jossang I, Aamland A, Hjorleifsson S . Discovering strengths in patients with medically unexplained symptoms - a focus group study with general practitioners. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022; 40(3):405-413. PMC: 9848323. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2139345. View

16.

Lambert S, Loiselle C . Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(2):228-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x. View

17.

Carlin E, Alberti H, Davies K . Denigration of general practice as a career choice: The students' perspective. A qualitative study. BJGP Open. 2020; 5(1). PMC: 7960518. DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101132. View

18.

Reeve J . Rethinking generalist health care: opportunities from challenges. Br J Gen Pract. 2022; 72(720):338-339. PMC: 9256062. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp22X719993. View

19.

Kay V, Livingstone C . A socioecological discourse of care or an economistic discourse: which fits better with transition?. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2021; 45(1):71-79. DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.13070. View