» Articles » PMID: 38721018

Clustering Approaches for Gait Analysis Within Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review

Overview
Journal Digit Biomark
Date 2024 May 9
PMID 38721018
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The prevalence of neurological disorders is increasing, underscoring the importance of objective gait analysis to help clinicians identify specific deficits. Nevertheless, existing technological solutions for gait analysis often suffer from impracticality in daily clinical use, including excessive cost, time constraints, and limited processing capabilities.

Summary: This review aims to evaluate existing techniques for clustering patients with the same neurological disorder to assist clinicians in optimizing treatment options. A narrative review of thirteen relevant studies was conducted, characterizing their methods, and evaluating them against seven criteria. Additionally, the results are summarized in two comprehensive tables. Recent approaches show promise; however, our results indicate that, overall, only three approaches display medium or high process maturity, and only two show high clinical applicability.

Key Messages: Our findings highlight the necessity for advancements, specifically regarding the use of markerless optical tracking systems, the optimization of experimental plans, and the external validation of results. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of existing clustering techniques, bridging the gap between instrumented gait analysis and its real-world clinical utility. We encourage researchers to use our findings and those from other medical fields to enhance clustering techniques for patients with neurological disorders, facilitating the identification of disparities within groups and their extent, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

Optimizing Rare Disease Gait Classification through Data Balancing and Generative AI: Insights from Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxia.

Trabassi D, Castiglia S, Bini F, Marinozzi F, Ajoudani A, Lorenzini M Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(11).

PMID: 38894404 PMC: 11175240. DOI: 10.3390/s24113613.

References
1.
Barzyk P, Zimmermann P, Stein M, Keim D, Gruber M . AI-smartphone markerless motion capturing of hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematics during countermovement jumps. Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(10):1452-1462. PMC: 11451555. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12186. View

2.
Barth J, Klucken J, Kugler P, Kammerer T, Steidl R, Winkler J . Biometric and mobile gait analysis for early diagnosis and therapy monitoring in Parkinson's disease. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012; 2011:868-71. DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090226. View

3.
Deuschl G, Beghi E, Fazekas F, Varga T, Christoforidi K, Sipido E . The burden of neurological diseases in Europe: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Public Health. 2020; 5(10):e551-e567. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30190-0. View

4.
Mc Ardle R, Morris R, Wilson J, Galna B, Thomas A, Rochester L . What Can Quantitative Gait Analysis Tell Us about Dementia and Its Subtypes? A Structured Review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017; 60(4):1295-1312. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-170541. View

5.
Papagiannis G, Triantafyllou A, Roumpelakis I, Zampeli F, Garyfallia Eleni P, Koulouvaris P . Methodology of surface electromyography in gait analysis: review of the literature. J Med Eng Technol. 2019; 43(1):59-65. DOI: 10.1080/03091902.2019.1609610. View