» Articles » PMID: 38720904

Comparison of Upfront Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Salvage Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation After Immunosuppressive Therapy in Children with Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia - a Multicenter Study

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2024 May 9
PMID 38720904
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For children with severe aplastic anemia, if the first immunosuppressive therapy (IST) fails, it is not recommended to choose a second IST. Therefore, for patients without matched sibling donor (MSD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD), haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) can be chosen as a salvage treatment. This article aims to explore the comparison between upfront Haplo-HSCT and salvage Haplo-HSCT after IST.

Methods: 29 patients received salvage Haplo-HSCT, and 50 patients received upfront Haplo-HSCT. The two groups received Bu (Busulfan, 3.2mg/kg/d*2d on days -9 to-8), CY (Cyclophosphamide, 60mg/kg/d*2d on days -4 to-3), Flu (fludarabine, 40mg/m/d*5d on days -9 to -5) and rabbit ATG (Anti-thymocyte globulin, total dose 10mg/kg divided into days -4 to -2).

Results: The OS of the salvage Haplo-HSCT group showed no difference to the upfront Haplo-HSCT group (80.2 ± 8.0% vs. 88.7 ± 4.8%, p=0.37). The FFS of the salvage Haplo-HSCT group also showed no difference to the frontline Haplo-HSCT group (75 ± 8.2% vs. 84.9 ± 5.3%, p=0.27). There was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications after transplantation between the two groups, except for thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). In the grouping analysis by graft source, the incidence of II-IV aGVHD in patients using PBSC ± BM+UCB was lower than that in the PBSC ± BM group (p=0.010).

Conclusion: Upfront Haplo-HSCT and salvage Haplo-HSCT after IST in children with acquired severe aplastic anemia have similar survival outcomes. However, the risk of TMA increases after salvage Haplo-HSCT. This article provides some reference value for the treatment selection of patients. In addition, co-transplantation of umbilical cord blood may reduce the incidence of GVHD.

References
1.
Stein R, Means Jr R, Krantz S, FLEXNER J, Greer J . Treatment of aplastic anemia with an investigational antilymphocyte serum prepared in rabbits. Am J Med Sci. 1994; 308(6):338-43. DOI: 10.1097/00000441-199412000-00005. View

2.
Liu L, Zhang Y, Jiao W, Zhou H, Wang Q, Jin S . Comparison of efficacy and health-related quality of life of first-line haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with unrelated cord blood infusion and first-line immunosuppressive therapy for acquired severe aplastic anemia. Leukemia. 2020; 34(12):3359-3369. DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0933-7. View

3.
Zhang X, Chen J, Han M, Huang H, Jiang E, Jiang M . The consensus from The Chinese Society of Hematology on indications, conditioning regimens and donor selection for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: 2021 update. J Hematol Oncol. 2021; 14(1):145. PMC: 8441240. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-021-01159-2. View

4.
Yoshida N, Kojima S . Updated Guidelines for the Treatment of Acquired Aplastic Anemia in Children. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018; 20(9):67. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-018-0716-8. View

5.
Deotare U, Al-Dawsari G, Couban S, Lipton J . G-CSF-primed bone marrow as a source of stem cells for allografting: revisiting the concept. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015; 50(9):1150-6. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2015.80. View