» Articles » PMID: 38720349

Fertility-sparing Surgery in Children and Adolescents with Borderline Ovarian Tumors: a Retrospective Study

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the characteristics of children and adolescents with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) and evaluate the efficacy and safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in these patients.

Methods: Patients with BOTs younger than 20 years who underwent FSS were included in this study.

Results: A total of 34 patients were included, with a median patient age of 17 (range, 3-19) years; 97.1% (33/34) of cases occurred after menarche. Of the patients, 82.4% had mucinous borderline tumors (MBOTs), 14.7% had serous borderline tumors (SBOTs), and 2.9% had seromucinous borderline tumor (SMBOT). The median tumor size was 20.4 (range, 8-40)cm. All patients were at International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I and all underwent FSS: cystectomy (unilateral ovarian cystectomy, UC, 14/34, 41.2% and bilateral ovarian cystectomy, BC, 1/34, 2.9%), unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO; 18/34; 52.9%), or USO + contralateral ovarian cystectomy (1/34; 2.9%). The median follow-up time was 65 (range, 10-148) months. Recurrence was experienced by 10 of the 34 patients (29.4%). One patient with SBOT experienced progression to low-grade serous carcinoma after the third relapse. Two patients had a total of four pregnancies, resulting in three live births. The recurrence rate of UC was significantly higher in MBOTs than in USO (p = 0.005). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 67.1%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 100%.

Conclusions: Fertility-sparing surgery is feasible and safe for children and adolescents with BOTs. For patients with MBOTs, USO is recommended to lower the risk of recurrence.

References
1.
Flicek K, VanBuren W, Dudiak K, Lahkman Y, Chen L, Butler K . Borderline epithelial ovarian tumors: what the radiologist should know. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 46(6):2350-2366. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02688-z. View

2.
Tsikouras P, Liberis V, Galazios G, Panagiotidou C, Bouchlariotou S, Teichmann A . A retrospective analysis of twenty-eight borderline ovarian tumours in adolescent girls. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2009; 30(1):49-53. View

3.
Yazbek J, Aslam N, Tailor A, Hillaby K, Raju K, Jurkovic D . A comparative study of the risk of malignancy index and the ovarian crescent sign for the diagnosis of invasive ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 28(3):320-4. DOI: 10.1002/uog.2842. View

4.
Morice P, Uzan C, Fauvet R, Gouy S, Duvillard P, Darai E . Borderline ovarian tumour: pathological diagnostic dilemma and risk factors for invasive or lethal recurrence. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(3):e103-15. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70288-1. View

5.
Song T, Choi C, Lee Y, Kim T, Lee J, Bae D . Pediatric borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45(10):1955-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.06.012. View