» Articles » PMID: 38712237

Efficient Coding in Biophysically Realistic Excitatory-inhibitory Spiking Networks

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 May 7
PMID 38712237
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The principle of efficient coding posits that sensory cortical networks are designed to encode maximal sensory information with minimal metabolic cost. Despite the major influence of efficient coding in neuroscience, it has remained unclear whether fundamental empirical properties of neural network activity can be explained solely based on this normative principle. Here, we derive the structural, coding, and biophysical properties of excitatory-inhibitory recurrent networks of spiking neurons that emerge directly from imposing that the network minimizes an instantaneous loss function and a time-averaged performance measure enacting efficient coding. We assumed that the network encodes a number of independent stimulus features varying with a time scale equal to the membrane time constant of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. The optimal network has biologically-plausible biophysical features, including realistic integrate-and-fire spiking dynamics, spike-triggered adaptation, and a non-specific excitatory external input. The excitatory-inhibitory recurrent connectivity between neurons with similar stimulus tuning implements feature-specific competition, similar to that recently found in visual cortex. Networks with unstructured connectivity cannot reach comparable levels of coding efficiency. The optimal ratio of excitatory vs inhibitory neurons and the ratio of mean inhibitory-to-inhibitory vs excitatory-to-inhibitory connectivity are comparable to those of cortical sensory networks. The efficient network solution exhibits an instantaneous balance between excitation and inhibition. The network can perform efficient coding even when external stimuli vary over multiple time scales. Together, these results suggest that key properties of biological neural networks may be accounted for by efficient coding.

References
1.
Brendel W, Bourdoukan R, Vertechi P, Machens C, Deneve S . Learning to represent signals spike by spike. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020; 16(3):e1007692. PMC: 7135338. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007692. View

2.
Oldenburg I, Hendricks W, Handy G, Shamardani K, Bounds H, Doiron B . The logic of recurrent circuits in the primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2024; 27(1):137-147. PMC: 10774145. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-023-01510-5. View

3.
Timcheck J, Kadmon J, Boahen K, Ganguli S . Optimal noise level for coding with tightly balanced networks of spiking neurons in the presence of transmission delays. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(10):e1010593. PMC: 9576105. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010593. View

4.
Koren V, Deneve S . Computational Account of Spontaneous Activity as a Signature of Predictive Coding. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017; 13(1):e1005355. PMC: 5293286. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005355. View

5.
Pala A, Petersen C . In vivo measurement of cell-type-specific synaptic connectivity and synaptic transmission in layer 2/3 mouse barrel cortex. Neuron. 2014; 85(1):68-75. PMC: 4305188. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.025. View