» Articles » PMID: 38703067

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in US Women: Contemporary Prevalence Estimates from the RISE FOR HEALTH Study

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to estimate the prevalence of a wide range of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in US women, and explore associations with bother and discussion with health care providers, friends, and family.

Materials And Methods: We analyzed baseline data collected from May 2022 to December 2023 in the RISE FOR HEALTH study-a large, regionally representative cohort study of adult female community members. LUTS and related bother were measured by the 10-item Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network Symptom Index, and discussion was assessed by a study-specific item.

Results: Of the 3000 eligible participants, 73% (95% CI 71%-74%) reported any storage symptoms, 52% (95% CI 50%-53%) any voiding or emptying symptoms, and 11% (95% CI 10%-13%) any pain with bladder filling, for an overall LUTS prevalence of 79% (95% CI 78%-81%). This prevalence estimate included 43% (95% CI 41%-45%) of participants with mild to moderate symptoms and 37% (95% CI 35%-38%) with moderate to severe symptoms. Over one-third of participants reported LUTS-related bother (38%, 95% CI 36%-39%) and discussion (38%, 95% CI 36%-40%), whereas only 7.1% (95% CI 6.2%-8.1%) reported treatment. Urgency and incontinence (including urgency and stress incontinence) were associated with the greatest likelihood of bother and/or discussion (adjusted prevalence ratios = 1.3-2.3), even at mild to moderate levels. They were also the most commonly treated LUTS.

Conclusions: LUTS, particularly storage LUTS such as urgency and incontinence, were common and bothersome in the RISE study population, yet often untreated. Given this large burden, both prevention and treatment-related interventions are warranted to reduce the high prevalence and bother of LUTS.

Citing Articles

Developing a urinary incontinence primary care pathway: a mixed methods study.

Luebke M, Neuner J, Balza J, Davidson E, Hokanson J, Marowski S Fam Pract. 2024; 41(5):798-806.

PMID: 39026426 PMC: 11461143. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae035.

References
1.
Komesu Y, Schrader R, Ketai L, Rogers R, Dunivan G . Epidemiology of mixed, stress, and urgency urinary incontinence in middle-aged/older women: the importance of incontinence history. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 27(5):763-72. PMC: 4957945. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2888-1. View

2.
Coyne K, Sexton C, Irwin D, Kopp Z, Kelleher C, Milsom I . The impact of overactive bladder, incontinence and other lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life, work productivity, sexuality and emotional well-being in men and women: results from the EPIC study. BJU Int. 2008; 101(11):1388-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07601.x. View

3.
Mitteness L . The management of urinary incontinence by community-living elderly. Gerontologist. 1987; 27(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1093/geront/27.2.185. View

4.
Coyne K, Sexton C, Kopp Z, Chapple C, Kaplan S, Aiyer L . Assessing patients' descriptions of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and perspectives on treatment outcomes: results of qualitative research. Int J Clin Pract. 2010; 64(9):1260-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02450.x. View

5.
Flegal K, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll M, Fryar C, Ogden C . Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016; 315(21):2284-91. PMC: 11197437. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.6458. View