Dogs Understand the Role of a Human Partner in a Cooperative Task

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 May 3

PMID 38702498

Authors

Juliana Wallner Werneck Mendes

Marie Vindevogel

Ilka van Peer

Mayte Martinez

Giulia Cimarelli

Friederike Range

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Humans are exceptionally flexible in cooperation, partly due to our ability to recognize the roles of cooperative partners. While some non-human animals understand the need for a partner in such interactions, it is unclear whether they grasp the consequences of their partner's actions and adjust accordingly. Previous studies utilizing economic games with non-human animals yielded mixed results. We investigated dogs, known for their close cooperation with humans, in a stag hunt game. Dogs could cooperate for better rewards or defect for lower ones, while their human partners would either cooperate, never cooperate, or act randomly. We control for attraction to food, side bias, and local enhancement. Dogs were more likely to coordinate with their partners when it led to better rewards, suggesting that they understood their partner's actions. By highlighting this cognitive skill in dogs, we advance our knowledge of the intricate mechanisms driving cooperative behavior in non-human animals.

References

Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S, Valsecchi P . Is your choice my choice? The owners' effect on pet dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task. Anim Cogn. 2007; 11(1):167-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0102-7. View

Brosnan S, Beran M, Parrish A, Price S, Wilson B . Comparative approaches to studying strategy: towards an evolutionary account of primate decision making. Evol Psychol. 2013; 11(3):606-27. PMC: 10426938. View

Ostojic L, Clayton N . Behavioural coordination of dogs in a cooperative problem-solving task with a conspecific and a human partner. Anim Cogn. 2013; 17(2):445-59. PMC: 3920030. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-013-0676-1. View

Brosnan S, Parrish A, Beran M, Flemming T, Heimbauer L, Talbot C . Responses to the Assurance game in monkeys, apes, and humans using equivalent procedures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(8):3442-7. PMC: 3044417. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1016269108. View

Nagasawa M, Mitsui S, En S, Ohtani N, Ohta M, Sakuma Y . Social evolution. Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science. 2015; 348(6232):333-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1261022. View

Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H . Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci. 2005; 28(5):675-91. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X05000129. View

Martinez M, Robinson L, Brosnan S, Range F . Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task. Proc Biol Sci. 2023; 290(1993):20222189. PMC: 9928525. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2189. View

Range F, Marshall-Pescini S, Kratz C, Viranyi Z . Wolves lead and dogs follow, but they both cooperate with humans. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):3796. PMC: 6405935. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40468-y. View

Siniscalchi M, dIngeo S, Minunno M, Quaranta A . Communication in Dogs. Animals (Basel). 2018; 8(8). PMC: 6116041. DOI: 10.3390/ani8080131. View

10.

Fugazza C, Moesta A, Pogany A, Miklosi A . Social learning from conspecifics and humans in dog puppies. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):9257. PMC: 6033932. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27654-0. View

11.

Polgar Z, Miklosi A, Gacsi M . Strategies Used by Pet Dogs for Solving Olfaction-Based Problems at Various Distances. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0131610. PMC: 4503413. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131610. View

12.

Worsley H, OHara S . Cross-species referential signalling events in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn. 2018; 21(4):457-465. PMC: 6004278. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-018-1181-3. View

13.

Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H . Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner's curse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011; 65(1):47-55. PMC: 3015194. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5. View

14.

Barr D, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily H . Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2014; 68(3). PMC: 3881361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. View

15.

Herbranson W, Schroeder J . Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma. J Comp Psychol. 2010; 124(1):1-13. PMC: 3086893. DOI: 10.1037/a0017703. View

16.

McGetrick J, Fux L, Schullern-Schrattenhofen J, Rault J, Range F . Do pet dogs reciprocate the receipt of food from familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics?. Ethology. 2024; 130(4). PMC: 7616333. DOI: 10.1111/eth.13430. View

17.

Gfrerer N, Taborsky M . Working dogs cooperate among one another by generalised reciprocity. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:43867. PMC: 5338352. DOI: 10.1038/srep43867. View

18.

Asakawa-Haas K, Schiestl M, Bugnyar T, Massen J . Partner Choice in Raven (Corvus corax) Cooperation. PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0156962. PMC: 4902252. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156962. View

19.

Pongracz P, Rieger G, Vekony K . Grumpy Dogs Are Smart Learners-The Association between Dog-Owner Relationship and Dogs' Performance in a Social Learning Task. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(4). PMC: 8066820. DOI: 10.3390/ani11040961. View

20.

Wallner Werneck Mendes J, Resende B, Savalli C . A review of the unsolvable task in dog communication and cognition: comparing different methodologies. Anim Cogn. 2021; 24(5):907-922. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01501-8. View