» Articles » PMID: 38702404

A Study on Volumetric Change of Mandibular Condyles with Osteoarthritis Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 May 3
PMID 38702404
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to quantitatively assess three-dimensional changes in the mandibular condyle with osteoarthritis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Pre- and post-treatment CBCT images of temporomandibular joints (TMJs) from 66 patients were used to assess longitudinal changes in condylar volume within individual patients using 3D slicer software. Total volume difference (dV), net increase (dV + , bone deposition), and net decrease (dV- , bone resorption) after treatment were analyzed based on clinical and radiological factors. Condyles with surface erosion at their first visit showed significantly decreased volume after treatment compared to condyles without erosion (p < 0.05). Amounts of bone resorption and deposition were higher in condyles with surface erosion (both p < 0.01). In patients with condylar erosion, the presence of joint pain was associated with a decrease in condylar volume and an increase in net resorption (both p < 0.01). When both joint pain and condylar erosion were present, patients with parafunctional habits showed reduced condylar volume after treatment (p < 0.05). Condylar volume change after treatment was negatively correlated with the duration of pain relief (R = - 0.501, p < 0.05). These results indicate that condylar erosion and TMJ pain could be significant variables affecting TMJ volume changes after treatment. Establishing appropriate treatment strategies is crucial for managing condylar erosion and TMJ pain.

Citing Articles

Trends in dentomaxillofacial radiology.

Kamburoglu K World J Radiol. 2025; 17(1):97255.

PMID: 39876885 PMC: 11755909. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.97255.


Condylar Remodeling and Skeletal Changes Following Occlusal Splint and Manual Therapy: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study in Temporomandibular Disorders.

Taut M, Barbur I, Hedesiu M, Ban A, Leucuta D, Negucioiu M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39337052 PMC: 11433483. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185567.

References
1.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J, Pujol S . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9):1323-41. PMC: 3466397. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. View

2.
Ok S, Lee J, Kim Y, Lee J, Kim K, Jeong S . Anterior condylar remodeling observed in stabilization splint therapy for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014; 118(3):363-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.05.022. View

3.
Bianchi J, Goncalves J, de Oliveira Ruellas A, Ashman L, Vimort J, Yatabe M . Quantitative bone imaging biomarkers to diagnose temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 50(2):227-235. PMC: 7765741. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.018. View

4.
Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos R, Ramos E . The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19(11):1270-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009. View

5.
Manfredini D, Favero L, Gregorini G, Cocilovo F, Guarda-Nardini L . Natural course of temporomandibular disorders with low pain-related impairment: a 2-to-3-year follow-up study. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40(6):436-42. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12047. View