» Articles » PMID: 38702352

The PocketPerio Application Significantly Increases the Accuracy of Diagnosing Periodontal Conditions in Didactic and Chairside Settings

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 May 3
PMID 38702352
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study aimed to determine the accuracy of diagnosing periodontal conditions using the developed web-based PocketPerio application and evaluate the user's perspective on the use of PocketPerio. First, 22 third-year dental students (DS3) diagnosed ten cases without PocketPerio (control) and with PocketPerio (test) during a mock examination. Then, 105 DS3, 13 fourth-year dental students (DS4), and 32 senior second-year International Standing Program students (ISP2) used PocketPerio chairside. Statistical analysis was performed using a non-parametric paired two-tailed test of significance with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. The null hypothesis that PocketPerio did not increase the accuracy of periodontal diagnoses was rejected at α < 0.01. Periodontal diagnoses made using PocketPerio correlated with those made by periodontics faculty ("gold standard") in all cases. During the mock examination, PocketPerio significantly increased the accuracy of periodontal diagnoses compared to the control (52.73 vs. 13.18%, respectively). Chairside, PocketPerio significantly increased the accuracy of primary (100 vs. 40.0%) and secondary (100 vs. 14.25%) periodontal diagnoses compared to the respective controls. Students regardless of their training year felt more confident in diagnosing periodontal conditions using PocketPerio than their current tools, provided positive feedback on its features, and suggested avenues for its further development.

Citing Articles

Automating bone loss measurement on periapical radiographs for predicting the periodontitis stage and grade.

Ameli N, Gibson M, Kornerup I, Lagravere M, Gierl M, Lai H Front Dent Med. 2025; 5:1479380.

PMID: 39917648 PMC: 11797779. DOI: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1479380.

References
1.
Abou-Arraj R, Kaur M, Alkhoury S, Swain T, Geurs N, Souccar N . The new periodontal disease classification: Level of agreement on diagnoses and treatment planning at various dental education levels. J Dent Educ. 2021; 85(10):1627-1639. DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12636. View

2.
Graetz C, Mann L, Krois J, Salzer S, Kahl M, Springer C . Comparison of periodontitis patients' classification in the 2018 versus 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2019; 46(9):908-917. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13157. View

3.
Oh S, Yang J, Kim Y . Discrepancies in periodontitis classification among dental practitioners with different educational backgrounds. BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):39. PMC: 7821642. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01371-5. View

4.
Eke P, Page R, Wei L, Thornton-Evans G, Genco R . Update of the case definitions for population-based surveillance of periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2012; 83(12):1449-54. PMC: 6005373. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.110664. View

5.
Wang C, Hao Y, Di Gianfilippo R, Sugai J, Li J, Gong W . Machine learning-assisted immune profiling stratifies peri-implantitis patients with unique microbial colonization and clinical outcomes. Theranostics. 2021; 11(14):6703-6716. PMC: 8171076. DOI: 10.7150/thno.57775. View