» Articles » PMID: 38698750

Circulating Immune Cells Predict Prognosis and Clinical Response to Chemotherapy in Cholangiocarcinoma

Overview
Journal Curr Med Chem
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2024 May 3
PMID 38698750
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The immune system is linked to the prognosis and response to treatment of patients with cancer. However, the clinical implication of peripheral blood immune cells in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains vague. Thus, we aimed to assess whether peripheral circulating immune cells could be used as an indicator for prognosis and chemotherapeutic efficacy in CCA.

Methods: The distributions of immune subsets were analyzed in peripheral blood samples from 141 patients with CCA and 131 healthy volunteers by using flow cytometry. The variation in the subset distribution in the two groups and the relationship between clinicopathological features and the subpopulations were investigated. Meanwhile, we assessed the implications of lymphocyte subsets as predictors of chemotherapy outcomes and overall survival (OS).

Results: The proportion of total lymphocytes decreased, while the percentages of activated T cells as well as CD4CD25 regulatory T cells (Tregs) increased in CCA. Notably, lymphocyte proportion decreased in patients with regional lymph node (N) (p=0.016) and distant metastasis (M) (p= 0.001). Furthermore, our study showed that peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were significantly correlated with chemotherapy efficacy, with increased proportions of CD3 cells (p=0.021) and CD4 cells (p=0.016) in the effective group. Finally, the Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients with high natural killer (NK) cell proportion might have prolonged OS (p = 0.028).

Conclusion: The relationship between circulating immune cells with prognosis and chemotherapy response in patients with CCA highlights their potential application as an indicator of CCA prognosis and stratification of chemotherapy response.

Citing Articles

Research progress of T cells in cholangiocarcinoma.

Wang Z, Dai Y, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Chen P, Li Y Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1453344.

PMID: 40070825 PMC: 11893616. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1453344.


Characterization of a Syngeneic Orthotopic Model of Cholangiocarcinoma by [F]FDG-PET/MRI.

Zachhuber L, Filip T, Mozayani B, Lobsch M, Scheiner S, Vician P Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39061229 PMC: 11275149. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142591.

References
1.
Valle J, Kelley R, Nervi B, Oh D, Zhu A . Biliary tract cancer. Lancet. 2021; 397(10272):428-444. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00153-7. View

2.
Banales J, Cardinale V, Carpino G, Marzioni M, Andersen J, Invernizzi P . Expert consensus document: Cholangiocarcinoma: current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 13(5):261-80. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.51. View

3.
Blechacz B, Gores G . Cholangiocarcinoma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. Hepatology. 2008; 48(1):308-21. PMC: 2547491. DOI: 10.1002/hep.22310. View

4.
Marsh R, Alonzo M, Bajaj S, Baker M, Elton E, Farrell T . Comprehensive review of the diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancer 2012. Part I: diagnosis-clinical staging and pathology. J Surg Oncol. 2012; 106(3):332-8. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23028. View

5.
Primrose J, Fox R, Palmer D, Malik H, Prasad R, Mirza D . Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(5):663-673. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30915-X. View