» Articles » PMID: 38695475

The Predictive Value of the Inflammatory Prognostic Index for Detecting No-Reflow in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Overview
Date 2024 May 2
PMID 38695475
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: No-reflow (NR) is characterized by an acute reduction in coronary flow that is not accompanied by coronary spasm, thrombosis, or dissection. Inflammatory prognostic index (IPI) is a novel marker that was reported to have a prognostic role in cancer patients and is calculated by neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) multiplied by C-reactive protein/albumin ratio.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the relationship between IPI and NR in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI).

Methods: A total of 1541 patients were enrolled in this study (178 with NR and 1363 with reflow). Lasso panelized shrinkage was used for variable selection. A nomogram was created based on IPI for detecting the risk of NR development. Internal validation with Bootstrap resampling was used for model reproducibility. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was accepted as a significance level for statistical analyses.

Results: IPI was higher in patients with NR than in patients with reflow. IPI was non-linearly associated with NR. IPI had a higher discriminative ability than the systemic immune-inflammation index, NLR, and CRP/albumin ratio. Adding IPI to the baseline multivariable logistic regression model improved the discrimination and net-clinical benefit effect of the model for detecting NR patients, and IPI was the most prominent variable in the full model. A nomogram was created based on IPI to predict the risk of NR. Bootstrap internal validation of nomogram showed a good calibration and discrimination ability.

Conclusion: This is the first study that shows the association of IPI with NR in STEMI patients who undergo pPCI.

Citing Articles

Inflammation and No-Reflow: Can it be a Game-Changer?.

Timoteo A Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024; 121(5):e20240119.

PMID: 38896586 PMC: 11164438. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20240119.

References
1.
Wang Z, Ren L, Lei L, Ye H, Peng J . The relationship between neutrophil counts on admission and angiographic no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol. 2016; 71(2):241-6. DOI: 10.2143/AC.71.2.3141856. View

2.
Celik T, Iyisoy A, Kursaklioglu H, Turhan H, Kilic S, Kose S . The impact of admission C-reactive protein levels on the development of poor myocardial perfusion after primary percutaneous intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2005; 16(5):293-9. DOI: 10.1097/00019501-200508000-00006. View

3.
Gibson C, Cannon C, Daley W, Dodge Jr J, Alexander Jr B, MARBLE S . TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996; 93(5):879-88. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.93.5.879. View

4.
Michaels A, Gibson C, Barron H . Microvascular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction: focus on the roles of platelet and inflammatory mediators in the no-reflow phenomenon. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 85(5A):50B-60B. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00811-0. View

5.
Durante A, Camici P . Novel insights into an "old" phenomenon: the no reflow. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 187:273-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.359. View