» Articles » PMID: 38693998

A Protein-Adsorbent Hydrogel with Tunable Stiffness for Tissue Culture Demonstrates Matrix-Dependent Stiffness Responses

Overview
Journal Adv Funct Mater
Date 2024 May 2
PMID 38693998
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although tissue culture plastic has been widely employed for cell culture, the rigidity of plastic is not physiologic. Softer hydrogels used to culture cells have not been widely adopted in part because coupling chemistries are required to covalently capture extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and support cell adhesion. To create an system with tunable stiffnesses that readily adsorbs ECM proteins for cell culture, we present a novel hydrophobic hydrogel system chemically converting hydroxyl residues on the dextran backbone to methacrylate groups, thereby transforming non-protein adhesive, hydrophilic dextran to highly protein adsorbent substrates. Increasing methacrylate functionality increases the hydrophobicity in the resulting hydrogels and enhances ECM protein adsorption without additional chemical reactions. These hydrophobic hydrogels permit facile and tunable modulation of substrate stiffness independent of hydrophobicity or ECM coatings. Using this approach, we show that substrate stiffness and ECM adsorption work together to affect cell morphology and proliferation, but the strengths of these effects vary in different cell types. Furthermore, we reveal that stiffness mediated differentiation of dermal fibroblasts into myofibroblasts is modulated by the substrate ECM. Our material system demonstrates remarkable simplicity and flexibility to tune ECM coatings and substrate stiffness and study their effects on cell function.

Citing Articles

Emerging strategies for nitric oxide production and their topical application as nanodressings to promote diabetic wound healing.

Xia D, Guo Y, Xu R, Li N J Nanobiotechnology. 2025; 23(1):53.

PMID: 39881346 PMC: 11776289. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03135-1.


Nanoclay-Composite Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Hwang H, Lee C Gels. 2024; 10(8).

PMID: 39195042 PMC: 11353637. DOI: 10.3390/gels10080513.


The role of extracellular matrix in angiogenesis: Beyond adhesion and structure.

Libby J, Royce H, Walker S, Li L Biomater Biosyst. 2024; 15:100097.

PMID: 39129826 PMC: 11315062. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbiosy.2024.100097.

References
1.
Discher D, Janmey P, Wang Y . Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005; 310(5751):1139-43. DOI: 10.1126/science.1116995. View

2.
Wei Q, Becherer T, Angioletti-Uberti S, Dzubiella J, Wischke C, Neffe A . Protein interactions with polymer coatings and biomaterials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014; 53(31):8004-31. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201400546. View

3.
Caliari S, Burdick J . A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(5):405-14. PMC: 5800304. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3839. View

4.
Chaudhuri O, Cooper-White J, Janmey P, Mooney D, Shenoy V . Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature. 2020; 584(7822):535-546. PMC: 7676152. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2612-2. View

5.
Charrier E, Pogoda K, Wells R, Janmey P . Control of cell morphology and differentiation by substrates with independently tunable elasticity and viscous dissipation. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):449. PMC: 5792430. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02906-9. View