» Articles » PMID: 38693648

Tumors Affect the Metabolic Connectivity of the Human Brain Measured by 18 F-FDG PET

Overview
Journal Clin Nucl Med
Specialty Nuclear Medicine
Date 2024 May 2
PMID 38693648
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: 18 F-FDG PET captures the relationship between glucose metabolism and synaptic activity, allowing for modeling brain function through metabolic connectivity. We investigated tumor-induced modifications of brain metabolic connectivity.

Patients And Methods: Forty-three patients with left hemispheric tumors and 18 F-FDG PET/MRI were retrospectively recruited. We included 37 healthy controls (HCs) from the database CERMEP-IDB-MRXFDG. We analyzed the whole brain and right versus left hemispheres connectivity in patients and HC, frontal versus temporal tumors, active tumors versus radiation necrosis, and patients with high Karnofsky performance score (KPS = 100) versus low KPS (KPS < 70). Results were compared with 2-sided t test ( P < 0.05).

Results: Twenty high-grade glioma, 4 low-grade glioma, and 19 metastases were included. The patients' whole-brain network displayed lower connectivity metrics compared with HC ( P < 0.001), except assortativity and betweenness centrality ( P = 0.001). The patients' left hemispheres showed decreased similarity, and lower connectivity metrics compared with the right ( P < 0.01), with the exception of betweenness centrality ( P = 0.002). HC did not show significant hemispheric differences. Frontal tumors showed higher connectivity metrics ( P < 0.001) than temporal tumors, but lower betweenness centrality ( P = 4.5 -7 ). Patients with high KPS showed higher distance local efficiency ( P = 0.01), rich club coefficient ( P = 0.0048), clustering coefficient ( P = 0.00032), betweenness centrality ( P = 0.008), and similarity ( P = 0.0027) compared with low KPS. Patients with active tumor(s) (14/43) demonstrated significantly lower connectivity metrics compared with necroses.

Conclusions: Tumors cause reorganization of metabolic brain networks, characterized by formation of new connections and decreased centrality. Patients with frontal tumors retained a more efficient, centralized, and segregated network than patients with temporal tumors. Stronger metabolic connectivity was associated with higher KPS.

References
1.
Caminiti S, Tettamanti M, Sala A, Presotto L, Iannaccone S, Cappa S . Metabolic connectomics targeting brain pathology in dementia with Lewy bodies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016; 37(4):1311-1325. PMC: 5453453. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X16654497. View

2.
Lau E, Phillips C, Poeppel D . A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008; 9(12):920-33. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2532. View

3.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N . Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273-89. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0978. View

4.
Bullmore E, Sporns O . Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(3):186-98. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2575. View

5.
Iaccarino L, Sala A, Caminiti S, Presotto L, Perani D . In vivo MRI Structural and PET Metabolic Connectivity Study of Dopamine Pathways in Alzheimer's Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020; 75(3):1003-1016. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190954. View