» Articles » PMID: 38693502

Evaluating Feedback Reports to Support Documentation of Veterans' Care Preferences in Home Based Primary Care

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 May 1
PMID 38693502
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness of delivering feedback reports to increase completion of LST notes among VA Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) teams. The Life Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative (LSTDI) was implemented throughout the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in the United States in 2017 to ensure that seriously ill Veterans have care goals and LST decisions elicited and documented.

Methods: We distributed monthly feedback reports summarizing LST template completion rates to 13 HBPC intervention sites between October 2018 and February 2020 as the sole implementation strategy. We used principal component analyses to match intervention to 26 comparison sites and used interrupted time series/segmented regression analyses to evaluate the differences in LST template completion rates between intervention and comparison sites. Data were extracted from national databases for VA HBPC in addition to interviews and surveys in a mixed methods process evaluation.

Results: LST template completion rose from 6.3 to 41.9% across both intervention and comparison HBPC teams between March 1, 2018, and February 26, 2020. There were no statistically significant differences for intervention sites that received feedback reports.

Conclusions: Feedback reports did not increase documentation of LST preferences for Veterans at intervention compared with comparison sites. Observed increases in completion rates across intervention and comparison sites can likely be attributed to implementation strategies used nationally as part of the national roll-out of the LSTDI. Our results suggest that feedback reports alone were not an effective implementation strategy to augment national implementation strategies in HBPC teams.

References
1.
Landis-Lewis Z, Kononowech J, Scott W, Hogikyan R, Carpenter J, Periyakoil V . Designing clinical practice feedback reports: three steps illustrated in Veterans Health Affairs long-term care facilities and programs. Implement Sci. 2020; 15(1):7. PMC: 6975062. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0950-y. View

2.
Ersek M, Sales A, Keddem S, Ayele R, Haverhals L, Magid K . Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED): a protocol for an implementation study in the Veterans Health Administration. Implement Sci Commun. 2022; 3(1):78. PMC: 9296899. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00321-2. View

3.
Kirchner J, Smith J, Powell B, Waltz T, Proctor E . Getting a clinical innovation into practice: An introduction to implementation strategies. Psychiatry Res. 2019; 283:112467. PMC: 7239693. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.042. View

4.
Byrne M, Daw C, Nelson H, Urech T, Pietz K, Petersen L . Method to develop health care peer groups for quality and financial comparisons across hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2009; 44(2 Pt 1):577-92. PMC: 2677055. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00916.x. View

5.
Foglia M, Lowery J, Sharpe V, Tompkins P, Fox E . A Comprehensive Approach to Eliciting, Documenting, and Honoring Patient Wishes for Care Near the End of Life: The Veterans Health Administration's Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018; 45(1):47-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.007. View