» Articles » PMID: 38693418

Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of Indoor Relative Humidity on Deposition of Aerosols Generated During Tooth Grinding in a Real-world Clinical Setting

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2024 May 1
PMID 38693418
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Exposure to aerosol particles generated from tooth grinding has a negative impact on the health of dental personnel. The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the impact of indoor relative humidity (IRH) on the deposition of these suspended particles in a well-controlled dental environment.

Materials And Methods: In this study, a humidity control system was employed to effectively regulate and maintain indoor relative humidity (IRH). A novel computer-assisted numerical control system was developed to pre-treat the molar specimens, and accurately simulate clinical tooth grinding procedures. Each procedure was performed in triplicate, with an online real-time particle counter (ORPC; TR-8301, TongrenCo.) measuring aerosol production. All testing devices were controlled remotely. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis/ Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.05).

Results: The findings showed that with increasing IRH, the maximum peak concentration of aerosol particles decreased by 397% from 6.51 × 10 particles/m at 30% to 1.64 × 10 particles/m at 80%. The Kruskal-Wallis test results indicated a statistically significant effect of IRH on the aerosol increment (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Increasing the IRH level can effectively promote the deposition of aerosol particles, with a return to baseline within 15 min after reaching 60% or above.

Clinical Relevance: Our study suggested that maintaining IRH above 70% during the cleaning process, allowing natural recovery to ambient humidity levels within 15 min after cleaning, and taking basic precautions, may lead to an adequate reduction in the possible health risks of aerosol contamination.

References
1.
Eliades T, Koletsi D . Minimizing the aerosol-generating procedures in orthodontics in the era of a pandemic: Current evidence on the reduction of hazardous effects for the treatment team and patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020; 158(3):330-342. PMC: 7364170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.002. View

2.
Iliadi A, Koletsi D, Eliades T, Eliades G . Particulate Production and Composite Dust during Routine Dental Procedures. A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(11). PMC: 7321425. DOI: 10.3390/ma13112513. View

3.
Ireland A, Moreno T, Price R . Airborne particles produced during enamel cleanup after removal of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124(6):683-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00623-1. View

4.
van Landuyt K, Yoshihara K, Geebelen B, Peumans M, Godderis L, Hoet P . Should we be concerned about composite (nano-)dust?. Dent Mater. 2012; 28(11):1162-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.011. View

5.
cokic S, Asbach C, de Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Hoet P, Seo J . The effect of water spray on the release of composite nano-dust. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 24(7):2403-2414. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03100-x. View