The Impact of Green FDI on Environmental Quality in Less Developed Countries: A Case Study of Load Capacity Factor Based on PCSE and FGLS Techniques

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2024 May 1

PMID 38689988

Authors

Mahamane Famanta

Abid Ali Randhawa

Jiang Yajing

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of green foreign direct investment (GFDI) on environmental quality (EQ) in 34 less-developed countries (LDCs) from 2003 to 2021. We analyze balanced panel data using Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS) and Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE). Our findings reveal several vital insights: (1) GFDI helps improve EQ. (2) Environmental costs associated with economic growth are negative. (3) Trade openness positively influences EQ. (4) EQ is enhanced by institutional quality, energy use, and population expansion in the chosen countries. (5) The existence of a U-shaped curve was established. This is valuable to the relatively scanty literature on GFDI, especially in LDCs. To the best of our awareness, this study simultaneously employs the Load Capacity Factor (LCF) and Total Value of Announced Greenfield projects as proxies for environmental sustainability and GFDI for the first time. Secondly, incorporating PCSE and FGLS models in this context is an innovative methodological strategy. The present research work provides to the existing theoretical and empirical discussions on GFDI and EQ and has practical implications that inform policy-making.

References

Aminu N, Clifton N, Mahe S . From pollution to prosperity: Investigating the Environmental Kuznets curve and pollution-haven hypothesis in sub-Saharan Africa's industrial sector. J Environ Manage. 2023; 342:118147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118147. View

Bhat J . Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-impact on economic growth and CO emissions in five emerging market economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018; 25(35):35515-35530. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3523-8. View

Derindag O, Maydybura A, Kalra A, Wong W, Chang B . Carbon emissions and the rising effect of trade openness and foreign direct investment: Evidence from a threshold regression model. Heliyon. 2023; 9(7):e17448. PMC: 10338304. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17448. View

Zhou R . Economic growth, energy consumption and CO emissions-An empirical study based on the Yangtze River economic belt of China. Heliyon. 2023; 9(9):e19865. PMC: 10559241. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19865. View

Zhong S, Wang H . The effect of total factor productivity of forestry industry on CO emissions: a spatial econometric analysis of China. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14200. PMC: 8270944. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93770-z. View

Kocak E, Sarkgunesi A . The impact of foreign direct investment on CO emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017; 25(1):790-804. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0468-2. View

Adedoyin F, Nathaniel S, Adeleye N . An investigation into the anthropogenic nexus among consumption of energy, tourism, and economic growth: do economic policy uncertainties matter?. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020; 28(3):2835-2847. PMC: 7476679. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10638-x. View

Haldar A, Sethi N . Effect of institutional quality and renewable energy consumption on CO emissions-an empirical investigation for developing countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020; 28(12):15485-15503. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11532-2. View

Li L, Msaad H, Sun H, Tan M, Lu Y, Lau A . Green Innovation and Business Sustainability: New Evidence from Energy Intensive Industry in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(21). PMC: 7663660. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217826. View

10.

Bui Minh T, Nguyen Ngoc T, Bui Van H . Relationship between carbon emissions, economic growth, renewable energy consumption, foreign direct investment, and urban population in Vietnam. Heliyon. 2023; 9(6):e17544. PMC: 10320259. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17544. View

11.

Van Tran N . The environmental effects of trade openness in developing countries: conflict or cooperation?. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020; 27(16):19783-19797. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08352-9. View

12.

Adebayo T, Akadiri S, Uhunamure S, Altuntas M, Shale K . Does political stability contribute to environmental sustainability? Evidence from the most politically stable economies. Heliyon. 2023; 8(12):e12479. PMC: 9800197. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12479. View

13.

Balsalobre-Lorente D, Gokmenoglu K, Taspinar N, Cantos-Cantos J . An approach to the pollution haven and pollution halo hypotheses in MINT countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019; 26(22):23010-23026. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05446-x. View

14.

Khan I, Hou F, Le H . The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 754:142222. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222. View

15.

Xu R, Wu Y, Wang G, Zhang X, Wu W, Xu Z . Evaluation of industrial water use efficiency considering pollutant discharge in China. PLoS One. 2019; 14(8):e0221363. PMC: 6711520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221363. View

16.

Qamruzzaman M . An asymmetric nexus between clean energy, good governance, education and inward FDI in China: Do environment and technology matter? Evidence for chines provincial data. Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e15612. PMC: 10149221. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15612. View

17.

Khan H, Weili L, Khan I . Institutional quality, financial development and the influence of environmental factors on carbon emissions: evidence from a global perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 29(9):13356-13368. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16626-z. View

18.

Sovacool B, Ali S, Bazilian M, Radley B, Nemery B, Okatz J . Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science. 2020; 367(6473):30-33. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz6003. View

19.

Mert M, Boluk G, Caglar A . Interrelationships among foreign direct investments, renewable energy, and CO emissions for different European country groups: a panel ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019; 26(21):21495-21510. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05415-4. View

20.

Zafar M, Saud S, Hou F . The impact of globalization and financial development on environmental quality: evidence from selected countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019; 26(13):13246-13262. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04761-7. View