» Articles » PMID: 38689622

Comparative Effectiveness of Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Stratified by Microsatellite Instability Status

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 May 1
PMID 38689622
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy have demonstrated promising outcomes in patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI) (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the comparative effectiveness of Immunotherapy and chemotherapy for patients with low MSI (MSI-L), and microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear.

Aim: To investigate immunotherapy chemotherapy for treatment of MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer, and to evaluate the success of immunotherapy against chemotherapy in managing MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer during a follow-up of 50 months.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy. The study population was stratified by MSI status (MSI-H, MSI-L, and MSS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between treatment modality and OS, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 21951 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in the analysis, of which 2358 were MSI-H, and 19593 were MSI-L/MSS. In the MSI-H cohort, immunotherapy treatment ( = 142) was associated with a significantly improved median OS compared to chemotherapy ( = 860). After adjusting for potential confounders, immunotherapy treatment remained significantly associated with better OS in the MSI-H cohort [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.43-0.77, < 0.001]. In the MSS cohort, no significant difference in median OS was observed between immunotherapy treatment and chemotherapy (aHR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.69-1.29, = 0.715).

Conclusion: In this population-based study using the NCDB, immunotherapy treatment was associated with significantly improved OS compared to chemotherapy in patients with MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer, but not in those with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal therapeutic approach for patients with MSI-L/MSS metastatic colorectal cancer.

Citing Articles

A Case Report of Pathologically Complete Response of a Huge Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer After Treatment with Intratumoral Oncolytic Virus H101 and Capecitabine.

Wang Y, Wang T, Zhang Y Immunotargets Ther. 2024; 13:343-348.

PMID: 38978969 PMC: 11230130. DOI: 10.2147/ITT.S470018.

References
1.
Shulman K, Barnett-Griness O, Friedman V, Greenson J, Gruber S, Lejbkowicz F . Outcomes of Chemotherapy for Microsatellite Instable-High Metastatic Colorectal Cancers. JCO Precis Oncol. 2020; 2. PMC: 7446482. DOI: 10.1200/PO.17.00253. View

2.
Heinemann V, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Decker T, Kiani A, Vehling-Kaiser U, Al-Batran S . FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(10):1065-75. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4. View

3.
Douillard J, Siena S, Cassidy J, Tabernero J, Burkes R, Barugel M . Final results from PRIME: randomized phase III study of panitumumab with FOLFOX4 for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(7):1346-1355. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu141. View

4.
Guo Y, Xiong B, Zhang T, Cheng Y, Ma L . XELOX vs. FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis. Cancer Invest. 2016; 34(2):94-104. DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2015.1104689. View

5.
Simon K . Colorectal cancer development and advances in screening. Clin Interv Aging. 2016; 11:967-76. PMC: 4958365. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S109285. View