» Articles » PMID: 38688632

High-tailored Anal Canal Radiotherapy (HIT-ART): Outcomes of a 10-Year Single Center Clinical Experience

Overview
Journal In Vivo
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Apr 30
PMID 38688632
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aim: The current standard for anal cancer treatment is essentially a 'one size fits all' approach where the dose of radiotherapy is similar whether the tumor is very small or very large. Trials are ongoing to evaluate dose de-escalation or escalation in localized disease depending on tumor size. The aim of the study was to assess results of a personalized approach involving dose stratification by stage and boost dose adjusted according to tumor early response.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed squamous cell anal cancer (SCAC) patients treated between 2011 and 2021 by long-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concomitant chemotherapy (CT); a sequential boost could be administered by IMRT or interventional radiotherapy (IRT) to obtain a total equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) of 54-60 Gy.

Results: We analyzed 110 patients (61% T3-4 stage, 71% node-positive). A total of 68.2% of patients received a sequential boost, mainly by IRT; median total EQD2 to primary site was 59.3 Gy. Acute ≥G3 toxicity rate was 36.4%. Median follow-up (FUP) was 35.4 months. A total of 83% of patients achieved clinical complete response (cCR); locoregional recurrence (LRR) occurred in 20.9% and distant metastases in 6.4% of cases. A total of 12.7% patients underwent salvage surgery. A total of 25.5% of patients reported ≥G2 and 4.5% ≥G3 late toxicity. The estimated 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival and colostomy-free survival were 92%, 72% and 84% respectively; 3-year-LRR was 22%. Nodal stage was associated with poorer cCR probability and higher LRR (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Our results on a large cohort of patients with locally advanced SCAC and long FUP time confirmed the efficacy of IMRT; high local control and manageable toxicity also suggest IRT as a promising method in treatment personalization.

References
1.
Kovacs G, Tagliaferri L, Valentini V . Is an Interventional Oncology Center an advantage in the service of cancer patients or in the education? The Gemelli Hospital and INTERACTS experience. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2018; 9(6):497-498. PMC: 5808000. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2017.72603. View

2.
Shakir R, Adams R, Cooper R, Downing A, Geh I, Gilbert D . Patterns and Predictors of Relapse Following Radical Chemoradiation Therapy Delivered Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With a Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; 106(2):329-339. PMC: 6961207. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.016. View

3.
Bosset J, Roelofsen F, Morgan D, Budach V, Coucke P, Jager J . Shortened irradiation scheme, continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and fractionation of mitomycin C in locally advanced anal carcinomas. Results of a phase II study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Radiotherapy and.... Eur J Cancer. 2002; 39(1):45-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00377-5. View

4.
Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, Meadows H, Cunningham D, Begum R, Adab F . Best time to assess complete clinical response after chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (ACT II): a post-hoc analysis of randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(3):347-356. PMC: 5337624. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30071-2. View

5.
NIGRO N, SEYDEL H, Considine B, VAITKEVICIUS V, Leichman L, Kinzie J . Combined preoperative radiation and chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer. 1983; 51(10):1826-9. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830515)51:10<1826::aid-cncr2820511012>3.0.co;2-l. View