» Articles » PMID: 38688611

Targeting Methionine Addiction Combined With Low-dose Irinotecan Arrested Colon Cancer in Contrast to High-dose Irinotecan Alone, Which Was Ineffective, in a Nude-mouse Model

Abstract

Background/aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-leading cause of death in the world. Although the prognosis has improved due to improvement of chemotherapy, metastatic CRC is still a recalcitrant disease, with a 5-year survival of only 13%. Irinotecan (IRN) is used as first-line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable CRC. However, there are severe side effects, such as neutropenia and diarrhea, which are dose-limiting. We have previously shown that methionine restriction (MR), effected by recombinant methioninase (rMETase), lowered the effective dose of IRN of colon-cancer cells in vitro. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of low-dose IRN and MR on colon-cancer in nude mice.

Materials And Methods: HCT-116 colon-cancer cells were cultured and subcutaneously injected into the flank of nude mice. After the tumor size reached approximately 100 mm, 18 mice were randomized into three groups; Group 1: untreated control on a normal diet; Group 2: high-dose IRN on a normal diet (2 mg/kg, i.p.); Group 3: low-dose IRN (1 mg/kg i.p.) on MR effected by a methionine-depleted diet.

Results: There was no significant difference between the control mice and the mice treated with high-dose IRN, without MR. However, low-dose IRN combined with MR was significantly more effective than the control and arrested colon-cancer growth (p=0.03). Body weight loss was reversible in the mice treated by low-dose IRN combined with MR.

Conclusion: The combination of low-dose IRN and MR acted synergistically in arresting HCT-116 colon-cancer grown in nude mice. The present study indicates the MR has the potential to reduce the effective dose of IRN in the clinic.

Citing Articles

The Combination of Methionine Restriction and Docetaxel Synergistically Arrests Androgen-independent Prostate Cancer But Not Normal Cells.

Mizuta K, Mori R, Han Q, Morinaga S, Sato M, Kang B Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024; 4(4):402-407.

PMID: 38962551 PMC: 11215443. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10339.

References
1.
Kciuk M, Marciniak B, Kontek R . Irinotecan-Still an Important Player in Cancer Chemotherapy: A Comprehensive Overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(14). PMC: 7404108. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21144919. View

2.
Coalson D, Mecham J, Stern P, Hoffman R . Reduced availability of endogenously synthesized methionine for S-adenosylmethionine formation in methionine-dependent cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(14):4248-51. PMC: 346647. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.14.4248. View

3.
Yamada Y, Denda T, Gamoh M, Iwanaga I, Yuki S, Shimodaira H . S-1 and irinotecan plus bevacizumab versus mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRICOLORE): a randomized, open-label, phase III, noninferiority trial. Ann Oncol. 2018; 29(3):624-631. PMC: 5889030. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx816. View

4.
Hoffman R, Jacobsen S . Reversible growth arrest in simian virus 40-transformed human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980; 77(12):7306-10. PMC: 350491. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7306. View

5.
Benson A, Venook A, Al-Hawary M, Arain M, Chen Y, Ciombor K . Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19(3):329-359. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012. View