» Articles » PMID: 38686575

Exposure Assessment and Monitoring of Antiblastic Drugs Preparation in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Med Lav
Date 2024 Apr 30
PMID 38686575
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several antiblastic drugs (ADs) are classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic, and/or toxic for reproduction. Despite established guidelines and safe handling technologies, ADs contamination of the work environments could occur in healthcare settings, leading to potential exposure of healthcare staff. This systematic review aims to investigate the main techniques and practices for assessing ADs occupational exposure in healthcare settings. The reviewed studies unveil that workplace contamination by ADs appears to be a still-topical problem in healthcare settings. These issues are linked to difficulties in guaranteeing: (i) the adherence to standardized protocols when dealing with ADs, (ii) the effective use of personal protective equipment by operators involved in the administration or management of ADs, (iii) a comprehensive training of the healthcare personnel, and (iv) a thorough health surveillance of exposed workers. A "multi-parametric" approach emerges as a desirable strategy for exposure assessment. In parallel, exposure assessment should coincide with the introduction of novel technologies aimed at minimizing exposure (i.e., risk management). Assessment must consider various departments and health operators susceptible to ADs contamination, with a focus extended beyond worst-case scenarios, also considering activities like surface cleaning and logistical tasks related to ADs management. A comprehensive approach in ADs risk assessment enables the evaluation of distinct substance behaviors and subsequent exposure routes, affording a more holistic understanding of potential risks.

References
1.
Dugheri S, Bonari A, Pompilio I, Boccalon P, Mucci N, Arcangeli G . A new approach to assessing occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs in hospital environments. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2018; 69(3):226-237. DOI: 10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3125. View

2.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

3.
Siderov J, Kirsa S, McLauchlan R . Reducing workplace cytotoxic surface contamination using a closed-system drug transfer device. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2009; 16(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1177/1078155209352543. View

4.
Connor T, DeBord D, Pretty J, Oliver M, Roth T, Lees P . Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers. J Occup Environ Med. 2010; 52(10):1019-27. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f72b63. View

5.
Kim O, Lee H, Jung H, Jang H, Pang Y, Cheong H . Korean nurses' adherence to safety guidelines for chemotherapy administration. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019; 40:98-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.04.002. View