» Articles » PMID: 38686158

Ethical and Professional Decision-Making Capabilities of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: Evaluating ChatGPT's Professional Competencies in Medicine

Overview
Journal Med Sci Educ
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Apr 30
PMID 38686158
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We examined the performance of artificial intelligence chatbots on the PREview Practice Exam, an online situational judgment test for professionalism and ethics.

Methods: We used validated methodologies to calculate scores and descriptive statistics, tests, and Fisher's exact tests to compare scores by model and competency.

Results: GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 scored 6/9 (76th percentile) and 7/9 (92nd percentile), respectively, higher than medical school applicant averages of 5/9 (56th percentile). Both models answered 95 + % of questions correctly.

Conclusions: Chatbots outperformed the average applicant on PREview, suggesting their potential for healthcare training and decision-making and highlighting risks of online assessment delivery.

References
1.
Husbands A, Rodgerson M, Dowell J, Patterson F . Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions. BMC Med Educ. 2015; 15:144. PMC: 4557748. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0424-0. View

2.
Webster E, Paton L, Crampton P, Tiffin P . Situational judgement test validity for selection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ. 2020; 54(10):888-902. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14201. View