» Articles » PMID: 38686029

Pharmacokinetics of a Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Hydromorphone in Healthy Dogs

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2024 Apr 30
PMID 38686029
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Dosing recommendations for hydromorphone intravenous constant rate infusion (IV CRI) are derived from simulations following IV bolus administration. While this extrapolated dose regimen has been described clinically, pharmacokinetics (PK) of hydromorphone infusions in dogs are not yet described. The study objective was to describe the PK of hydromorphone in healthy dogs receiving an IV bolus followed by an IV CRI for 48 h.

Methods: A prospective, experimental study was performed involving the administration of hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg IV bolus then IV CRI 0.01 mg/kg/h over a 48 h period) to 6 healthy Beagle dogs. Blood samples were collected at 16 time points between 0 and 58 h relative to the initial bolus. Plasma hydromorphone concentrations were analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were obtained with compartmental methods using commercially available software.

Results: A two-compartment model with first order elimination was used. At the end of the infusion, median (range) plasma hydromorphone concentrations were 6.8 (5.5-19.6) ng/mL. The median total body clearance was 30.4 (19.8-36.7) mL/min/kg; volume of distribution at steady state was 4.5 (3.2-7.8) L/kg; and terminal elimination half-life was 11.2 (7.6-24.3) h.

Conclusion: Hydromorphone (0.1 mg/kg IV bolus then IV CRI of 0.01 mg/kg/h) maintained steady-state plasma concentrations above the minimum human analgesic target in healthy Beagle dogs with minimal side effects. Further studies are needed to determine the effective plasma concentrations of hydromorphone in painful dogs.

References
1.
Bateman S, Haldane S, Stephens J . Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of hydromorphone and oxymorphone in dogs and cats: a randomized blinded study. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008; 35(4):341-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2007.00387.x. View

2.
Gruen M, Lascelles B, Colleran E, Gottlieb A, Johnson J, Lotsikas P . 2022 AAHA Pain Management Guidelines for Dogs and Cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2022; 58(2):55-76. DOI: 10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7292. View

3.
Sano T, Nishimura R, Kanazawa H, Igarashi E, Nagata Y, Mochizuki M . Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl after single intravenous injection and constant rate infusion in dogs. Vet Anaesth Analg. 2006; 33(4):266-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00266.x. View

4.
Kuo W, Keegan R . Comparative cardiovascular, analgesic, and sedative effects of medetomidine, medetomidine-hydromorphone, and medetomidine-butorphanol in dogs. Am J Vet Res. 2004; 65(7):931-7. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.931. View

5.
Reidenberg M, Goodman H, ERLE H, Gray G, Lorenzo B, Leipzig R . Hydromorphone levels and pain control in patients with severe chronic pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988; 44(4):376-82. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1988.167. View