Sepsis Screening Protocol Implementation: a Clinician-validated Rapid Realist Review

Overview

Journal BMJ Open Qual

Publisher BMJ Publishing Group

Specialty Health Services

Date 2024 Apr 29

PMID 38684345

Authors

Jonathan Melville

Tracey Carr

Donna Goodridge

Nazeem Muhajarine

Gary Groot

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: The failed or partial implementation of clinical practices negatively impacts patient safety and increases systemic inefficiencies. Implementation of sepsis screening guidelines has been undertaken in many settings with mixed results. Without a theoretical understanding of what leads to successful implementation, improving implementation will continue to be ad hoc or intuitive. This study proposes a programme theory for how and why the successful implementation of sepsis screening guidelines can occur.

Methods: A rapid realist review was conducted to develop a focused programme theory for the implementation of sepsis screening guidelines. An independent two-reviewer approach was used to iteratively extract and synthesise context and mechanism data. Theoretical context-mechanism-outcome propositions were refined and validated by clinicians using a focus group and individual realist interviews. Implementation resources and clinical reasoning were differentiated in articulating mechanisms.

Results: Eighteen articles were included in the rapid review. The theoretical domains framework was identified as the salient substantive theory informing the programme theory. The theory consisted of five main middle-range propositions. Three promoting mechanisms included positive belief about the benefits of the protocol, belief in the legitimacy of using the protocol and trust within the clinical team. Two inhibiting mechanisms included pessimism about the protocol being beneficial and pessimism about the team. Successful implementation was defined as achieving fidelity and sustained use of the intervention. Two intermediate outcomes, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, and adoption, were necessary to achieve before successful implementation.

Conclusion: This rapid realist review synthesised key information from the literature and clinician feedback to develop a theory-based approach to clinical implementation of sepsis screening. The programme theory presents knowledge users with an outline of how and why clinical interventions lead to successful implementation and could be applied in other clinical areas to improve quality and safety.

References

Singer M, Deutschman C, Seymour C, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M . The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315(8):801-10. PMC: 4968574. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. View

Nilsen P . Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:53. PMC: 4406164. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0. View

Campbell H, Hotchkiss R, Bradshaw N, Porteous M . Integrated care pathways. BMJ. 1998; 316(7125):133-7. PMC: 2665398. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.133. View

Focht A, Jones A, Lowe T . Early goal-directed therapy: improving mortality and morbidity of sepsis in the emergency department. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009; 35(4):186-91. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35025-4. View

Peake S, Delaney A, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Cameron P, Cooper D . Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(16):1496-506. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. View

Carr T, Quinlan E, Robertson S, Gerrard A . Adapting realist synthesis methodology: The case of workplace harassment interventions. Res Synth Methods. 2017; 8(4):496-505. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1261. View

Michie S, van Stralen M, West R . The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011; 6:42. PMC: 3096582. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42. View

Tarrant C, ODonnell B, Martin G, Bion J, Hunter A, Rooney K . A complex endeavour: an ethnographic study of the implementation of the Sepsis Six clinical care bundle. Implement Sci. 2016; 11(1):149. PMC: 5112724. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0518-z. View

Whippy A, Skeath M, Crawford B, Adams C, Marelich G, Alamshahi M . Kaiser Permanente's performance improvement system, part 3: multisite improvements in care for patients with sepsis. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011; 37(11):483-93. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37061-4. View

10.

Wandersman A, Alia K, Cook B, Ramaswamy R . Integrating empowerment evaluation and quality improvement to achieve healthcare improvement outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24(10):645-52. PMC: 4602254. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003525. View

11.

Verdu A, Maestre A, Lopez P, Gil V, Martin-Hidalgo A, Castano J . Clinical pathways as a healthcare tool: design, implementation and assessment of a clinical pathway for lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009; 18(4):314-20. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023218. View

12.

Saldana L . The stages of implementation completion for evidence-based practice: protocol for a mixed methods study. Implement Sci. 2014; 9(1):43. PMC: 4234147. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-43. View

13.

Al Khalaf M, Al Ehnidi F, Al-Dorzi H, Tamim H, Abd-Aziz N, Tangiisuran B . Determinants of functional status among survivors of severe sepsis and septic shock: One-year follow-up. Ann Thorac Med. 2015; 10(2):132-6. PMC: 4375742. DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.150731. View

14.

Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337:a1655. PMC: 2769032. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a1655. View

15.

Steinmo S, Michie S, Fuller C, Stanley S, Stapleton C, Stone S . Bridging the gap between pragmatic intervention design and theory: using behavioural science tools to modify an existing quality improvement programme to implement "Sepsis Six". Implement Sci. 2016; 11:14. PMC: 4739425. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0376-8. View

16.

Shapiro N, Howell M, Talmor D, Lahey D, Ngo L, Buras J . Implementation and outcomes of the Multiple Urgent Sepsis Therapies (MUST) protocol. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34(4):1025-32. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000206104.18647.A8. View

17.

Tabak R, Khoong E, Chambers D, Brownson R . Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43(3):337-50. PMC: 3592983. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024. View

18.

Damiani E, Donati A, Serafini G, Rinaldi L, Adrario E, Pelaia P . Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One. 2015; 10(5):e0125827. PMC: 4422717. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125827. View

19.

Guirgis F, Jones L, Esma R, Weiss A, McCurdy K, Ferreira J . Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives. J Crit Care. 2017; 40:296-302. PMC: 5563264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.005. View

20.

Cooke L, Duncan D, Rivera L, Dowling S, Symonds C, Armson H . How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers?. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):104. PMC: 6069557. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0796-8. View