» Articles » PMID: 38683807

Winners and Losers: Emotional Shifts Across Elections Are Conveyed by a Politician's Smile

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Apr 29
PMID 38683807
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The human smile can convey both rewarding and affiliative social intent and thus has significant utility in politics, where the ability to bond with and reassure voters is vital to electoral success. We examine experimental evidence from the 2019 UK general election to investigate the influence of a politician's reward or affiliative smile on voter emotions. It was hypothesised that the winner's affiliative smile would engender positive affect across all partisan groups compared to the winner's reward smile display. Participants from a nationally representative sample were shown campaign footage containing both types of smiles from the leaders of the main competing political parties both before and after the election. Increases in happiness and affinity were revealed across all partisan groups when shown footage of the eventual winner's affiliative smile; at the same time, supporters of losing parties indicated a decrease in negative affect. Affinity has been shown to increase civic engagement. Thus, we conclude that affiliative smiles displayed by leading candidates during the campaign likely acted as a mechanism to align voter behaviour with the dominant political message.

References
1.
Johnston L, Miles L, Neil Macrae C . Why are you smiling at me? Social functions of enjoyment and non-enjoyment smiles. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009; 49(Pt 1):107-27. DOI: 10.1348/014466609X412476. View

2.
Keating C, Adjei Boateng F, Loiacono H, Sherwood W, Atwater K, Hutchison J . Charismatic Nonverbal Displays by Leaders Signal Receptivity and Formidability, and Tap Approach and Avoidance Motivational Systems. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:526288. PMC: 7643026. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.526288. View

3.
Paulus A, Rohr M, Dotsch R, Wentura D . Positive Feeling, Negative Meaning: Visualizing the Mental Representations of In-Group and Out-Group Smiles. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3):e0151230. PMC: 4786158. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151230. View

4.
Rychlowska M, van der Schalk J, Niedenthal P, Martin J, Carpenter S, Manstead A . Dominance, reward, and affiliation smiles modulate the meaning of uncooperative or untrustworthy behaviour. Cogn Emot. 2021; 35(7):1281-1301. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1948391. View

5.
Senior C, Phillips M, Barnes J, David A . An investigation into the perception of dominance from schematic faces: a study using the World-Wide Web. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999; 31(2):341-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207730. View