Article: Prevalence, Reach of Anti-smokeless Tobacco Messages and Quit Attempts by Product Type: A Secondary Data Analysis from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS - 2016-17)

Objective: India has the highest number of smokeless tobacco (SLT) products available in different forms, consumed in various ways. The current study aimed to understand the pattern of daily SLT use according to different product categories and whether Quit intention and Quit attempts vary by SLT type and exposure to media messages.

Methods: Data from Global Adult Tobacco Surveys (GATS), 2016-17, was used to find access to media messages and warning labels by SLT type. Quit attempt and Quit intention were calculated for each of the SLT types. Logistic regression analyses were employed to identify whether access to media messages, warning labels influenced, quit intention and attempts vary by SLT type.

Results: Khaini or tobacco lime mixture was the most common SLT type consumed by 37% of SLT users, whereas SLT users consuming more than one product accounted for 23% of SLT users. Exposure to media messages and warning labels was high among Gutkha/ paan masala tobacco users (74.7% and 81.2%) and low among oral tobacco (Mishri, Gul, Gudakhu) users (56.1% and 60.0%). Quit attempts and quit intention were high among Gutkha/ paan masala tobacco users (38.3% and 22.3%) and low among oral tobacco (Mishri, Gul, Gudakhu) users (25.3% and 13.6%). Users of Oral tobacco and khaini or tobacco-lime mixture were significantly less likely to attempt quitting (AOR 0.806(95%CI: 0.676-0.962), 0.839(95%CI: 0.736-0.956), and have quit intention (AOR 0.681(95%CI: 0.702-0.976), 0.733(95%CI: 0.627-0.857) compared to Gutkha/ paan masala with tobacco users.

Conclusion: The reach of media messages and warning labels varies by SLT type. Quit intention and attempts vary by SLT type and access to media messages and warning labels. There is a need to re-strategise the tobacco control Information, Education and Communication (IEC) to reach out with effective messaging to the most unreached.

Citing Articles

Tobacco Control in the Present Era: A Need for Inclusive Strategies.

Anand R, Sarode G, Sengupta N, Sarode S Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(8):2581-2582.

PMID: 39205553 PMC: 11495436. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.8.2581.

References

1.

Durkin S, Bayly M, Brennan E, Biener L, Wakefield M . Fear, Sadness and Hope: Which Emotions Maximize Impact of Anti-Tobacco Mass Media Advertisements among Lower and Higher SES Groups?. J Health Commun. 2018; 23(5):445-461. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1463320. View

2.

Schensul J, Begum S, Nair S, Oncken C . Challenges in Indian Women’s Readiness to Quit Smokeless Tobacco Use. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018; 19(6):1561-1569. PMC: 6103596. DOI: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.6.1561. View

3.

Turk T, Murukutla N, Gupta S, Kaur J, Mullin S, Saradhi R . Using a smokeless tobacco control mass media campaign and other synergistic elements to address social inequalities in India. Cancer Causes Control. 2012; 23 Suppl 1:81-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-9903-3. View

4.

Gravely S, Fong G, Driezen P, Xu S, Quah A, Sansone G . An examination of the effectiveness of health warning labels on smokeless tobacco products in four states in India: findings from the TCP India cohort survey. BMC Public Health. 2016; 16(1):1246. PMC: 5154141. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3899-7. View

5.

Iacobelli M, Saraf S, Welding K, Smith K, Cohen J . Manipulated: graphic health warnings on smokeless tobacco in rural India. Tob Control. 2019; 29(2):241-242. PMC: 7042974. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054715. View