Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool for Spina Bifida Can Predict Ambulation and Transfer Ability in Adults With Spina Bifida

Overview

Journal Am J Phys Med Rehabil

Specialty Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2024 Apr 29

PMID 38679812

Authors

Brad E Dicianno

Elise M Pearson

Matthew Mesoros

Amy J Houtrow

Gina McKernan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool. It was hypothesized that the Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool would have a good overall accuracy (≥80%) for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability and that overall accuracy of the Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool would be higher than that of other scales.

Design: A retrospective chart review was used to classify 409 adults with spina bifida according to seven neurological scales. A Naïve Bayes classifier was used to obtain accuracy estimates for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability as a function of each scale.

Results: The Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool was the only scale demonstrating >80% overall accuracy for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability. While several scales demonstrated ≥80% overall accuracy in predicting transfer ability, none were useful in predicting inability to transfer. Inability to transfer was difficult for all tools to predict.

Conclusions: The Pittsburgh Impairment Testing Tool demonstrated good overall accuracy for predicting both ambulation and transfer ability. Sensory and anatomic levels were less useful than motor level in predicting functional ability.

References

Tita A, Frampton J, Roehmer C, Izzo S, Houtrow A, Dicianno B . Correlation Between Neurologic Impairment Grade and Ambulation Status in the Adult Spina Bifida Population. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019; 98(12):1045-1050. PMC: 8246589. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001188. View

Bartonek A, Saraste H, Knutson L . Comparison of different systems to classify the neurological level of lesion in patients with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 41(12):796-805. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162299001607. View

Schoenmakers M, Uiterwaal C, Gulmans V, Gooskens R, Helders P . Determinants of functional independence and quality of life in children with spina bifida. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19(6):677-85. DOI: 10.1191/0269215505cr865oa. View

Maiz N, Arevalo S, Garcia-Manau P, Melendez M, Gine C, Rodo C . Presurgery motor level assessment for prediction of motor level at birth in fetuses undergoing prenatal repair of open spina bifida: time to abandon anatomical level in counseling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 61(6):728-733. DOI: 10.1002/uog.26180. View

Dicianno B, Kurowski B, Yang J, Chancellor M, Bejjani G, Fairman A . Rehabilitation and medical management of the adult with spina bifida. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 87(12):1027-50. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31818de070. View

Kirshblum S, Snider B, Rupp R, Schmidt Read M . Updates of the International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: 2015 and 2019. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020; 31(3):319-330. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2020.03.005. View

SHARRARD W . THE SEGMENTAL INNERVATION OF THE LOWER LIMB MUSCLES IN MAN. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1964; 35:106-22. PMC: 2311748. View

Gunay H, Sozbilen M, Gurbuz Y, Altinisik M, Buyukata B . Incidence and type of foot deformities in patients with spina bifida according to level of lesion. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015; 32(2):315-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-015-2944-7. View

Dicianno B, Bellin M, Zabel A . Spina bifida and mobility in the transition years. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 88(12):1002-6. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c1ede3. View

10.

Bartonek A, Saraste H . Factors influencing ambulation in myelomeningocele: a cross-sectional study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001; 43(4):253-60. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201000482. View

11.

Bakaniene I, Prasauskiene A, Vaiciene-Magistris N . Health-related quality of life in children with myelomeningocele: a systematic review of the literature. Child Care Health Dev. 2016; 42(5):625-43. DOI: 10.1111/cch.12367. View

12.

Rethlefsen S, Bent M, Mueske N, Wren T . Relationships among classifications of impairment and measures of ambulatory function for children with spina bifida. Disabil Rehabil. 2020; 43(25):3696-3700. PMC: 7541624. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1746845. View

13.

Broughton N, MENELAUS M, Cole W, Shurtleff D . The natural history of hip deformity in myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(5):760-3. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376434. View

14.

. The 2019 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)-What's new?. Spinal Cord. 2019; 57(10):815-817. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0350-9. View

15.

Fletcher J, Copeland K, Frederick J, Blaser S, Kramer L, Northrup H . Spinal lesion level in spina bifida: a source of neural and cognitive heterogeneity. J Neurosurg. 2005; 102(3 Suppl):268-79. DOI: 10.3171/ped.2005.102.3.0268. View

16.

Swaroop V, Dias L . Orthopedic management of spina bifida. Part I: hip, knee, and rotational deformities. J Child Orthop. 2009; 3(6):441-9. PMC: 2782071. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-009-0214-5. View

17.

Hoffer M, Feiwell E, Perry R, Perry J, Bonnett C . Functional ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973; 55(1):137-48. View

18.

Davis W, Zigler C, Crytzer T, Izzo S, Houtrow A, Dicianno B . Factors Associated With Ambulation in Myelomeningocele: A Longitudinal Study From the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 99(7):586-594. PMC: 8968579. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001406. View

19.

McKernan G, Izzo S, Crytzer T, Houtrow A, Dicianno B . Relationship Between Motor Level and Wheelchair Transfer Ability in Spina Bifida: A Study From the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 101(11):1953-1960. PMC: 8996082. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.016. View

20.

Dicianno B, Karmarkar A, Houtrow A, Crytzer T, Cushanick K, McCoy A . Factors Associated with Mobility Outcomes in a National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 94(12):1015-25. PMC: 5533185. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000404. View