» Articles » PMID: 38679562

DEep LearnIng-based QuaNtification of Epicardial Adipose Tissue Predicts MACE in Patients Undergoing Stress CMR

Abstract

Background And Aims: This study investigated the additional prognostic value of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients undergoing stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

Methods: 730 consecutive patients [mean age: 63 ± 10 years; 616 men] who underwent stress CMR for known or suspected coronary artery disease were randomly divided into derivation (n = 365) and validation (n = 365) cohorts. MACE was defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction and cardiac deaths. A deep learning algorithm was developed and trained to quantify EAT volume from CMR. EAT volume was adjusted for height (EAT volume index). A composite CMR-based risk score by Cox analysis of the risk of MACE was created.

Results: In the derivation cohort, 32 patients (8.7 %) developed MACE during a follow-up of 2103 days. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35 % (HR 4.407 [95 % CI 1.903-10.202]; p<0.001), stress perfusion defect (HR 3.550 [95 % CI 1.765-7.138]; p<0.001), late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) (HR 4.428 [95%CI 1.822-10.759]; p = 0.001) and EAT volume index (HR 1.082 [95 % CI 1.045-1.120]; p<0.001) were independent predictors of MACE. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, adding EAT volume index to a composite risk score including LVEF, stress perfusion defect and LGE provided additional value in MACE prediction, with a net reclassification improvement of 0.683 (95%CI, 0.336-1.03; p<0.001). The combined evaluation of risk score and EAT volume index showed a higher Harrel C statistic as compared to risk score (0.85 vs. 0.76; p<0.001) and EAT volume index alone (0.85 vs.0.74; p<0.001). These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort.

Conclusions: In patients with clinically indicated stress CMR, fully automated EAT volume measured by deep learning can provide additional prognostic information on top of standard clinical and imaging parameters.

Citing Articles

Roles of perivascular adipose tissue in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis - an update on recent findings.

Hara T, Sata M Front Physiol. 2025; 15():1522471.

PMID: 39835204 PMC: 11744021. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1522471.


Novel Insights into Non-Invasive Diagnostic Techniques for Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Critical Review.

Dicorato M, Basile P, Muscogiuri G, Carella M, Naccarati M, Dentamaro I Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410653 PMC: 11475987. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192249.


Computed Tomography Angiography Identified High-Risk Coronary Plaques: From Diagnosis to Prognosis and Future Management.

Dimitriadis K, Pyrpyris N, Theofilis P, Mantzouranis E, Beneki E, Kostakis P Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(15).

PMID: 39125547 PMC: 11311283. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14151671.


Beyond Stress Ischemia: Unveiling the Multifaceted Nature of Coronary Vulnerable Plaques Using Cardiac Computed Tomography.

Napoli G, Mushtaq S, Basile P, Carella M, De Feo D, Latorre M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(14).

PMID: 39064316 PMC: 11278082. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144277.