» Articles » PMID: 38675617

Process Optimization of Extract-Loaded Water in Oil Nanoemulsion Developed by Ultrasound-Assisted Homogenization

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38675617
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nanoemulsions are gaining interest in a variety of products as a means of integrating easily degradable bioactive compounds, preserving them from oxidation, and increasing their bioavailability. However, preparing stable emulsion compositions with the desired characteristics is a difficult task. The aim of this study was to encapsulate the aqueous extract (TCAE) into a water in oil (W/O) nanoemulsion and identify its critical process and formulation variables, like oil (27-29.4 mL), the surfactant concentration (0.6-3 mL), and sonication amplitude (40% to 100%), using response surface methodology (RSM). The responses of this formulation were studied with an analysis of the particle size (PS), free fatty acids (FFAs), and encapsulation efficiency (EE). In between, we have studied a fishbone diagram that was used to measure risk and preliminary research. The optimized condition for the formation of a stable nanoemulsion using quality by design was surfactant (2.43 mL), oil concentration (27.61 mL), and sonication amplitude (88.6%), providing a PS of 171.62 nm, FFA content of 0.86 meq/kg oil and viscosity of 0.597 Pa.s for the blank sample compared to the enriched TCAE nanoemulsion with a PS of 243.60 nm, FFA content of 0.27 meq/kg oil and viscosity of 0.22 Pa.s. The EE increases with increasing concentrations of TCAE, from 56.88% to 85.45%. The RSM response demonstrated that both composition variables had a considerable impact on the properties of the W/O nanoemulsion. Furthermore, after the storage time, the enriched TCAE nanoemulsion showed better stability over the blank nanoemulsion, specially the FFAs, and the blank increased from 0.142 to 1.22 meq/kg oil, while TCAE showed 0.266 to 0.82 meq/kg.

Citing Articles

Cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsion decorated with rhamnolipid for inhibition of methicillin-resistant biofilm formation: and assessment.

Yin L, Guo Y, Xv X, Dai Y, Li L, Sun F Front Microbiol. 2025; 15():1514659.

PMID: 39777149 PMC: 11703839. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1514659.

References
1.
Shekhawat P, Pokharkar V . Risk assessment and QbD based optimization of an Eprosartan mesylate nanosuspension: In-vitro characterization, PAMPA and in-vivo assessment. Int J Pharm. 2019; 567:118415. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.006. View

2.
Shariffa Y, Tan T, Uthumporn U, Abas F, Mirhosseini H, Nehdi I . Producing a lycopene nanodispersion: Formulation development and the effects of high pressure homogenization. Food Res Int. 2017; 101:165-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.005. View

3.
Gawin-Mikolajewicz A, Nawrot U, Malec K, Krajewska K, Nartowski K, Karolewicz B . The Effect of High-Pressure Homogenization Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties and Stability of Designed Fluconazole-Loaded Ocular Nanoemulsions. Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(1). PMC: 10818809. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16010011. View

4.
Pandey A, Karande K, Sonawane R, Deshmukh P . Applying quality by design (QbD) concept for fabrication of chitosan coated nanoliposomes. J Liposome Res. 2013; 24(1):37-52. DOI: 10.3109/08982104.2013.826243. View

5.
Daglia M, Di Lorenzo A, Nabavi S, Talas Z, Nabavi S . Polyphenols: well beyond the antioxidant capacity: gallic acid and related compounds as neuroprotective agents: you are what you eat!. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2014; 15(4):362-72. DOI: 10.2174/138920101504140825120737. View