» Articles » PMID: 38674253

Neutrophil-Creatinine Index: A New Prognostic Factor for Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38674253
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Determining the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) is the main goal in the early stage of AP. The aim of this study was to compare laboratory parameters and indices, including the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the neutrophil-creatinine index (NCI), at admission in order to predict the severity of AP. : Data from 421 patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of AP were collected retrospectively. Disease severity was assessed using the Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) and the revised Atlanta classification (RAC). BISAP was graded as mild and severe, and RAC was graded as mild (MAP), moderately severe (MSAP), and severe (SAP). The laboratory parameters and indices, including the NLR and NCI, were compared. : Of the patients, 70 (16.6%) had severe AP according to BISAP; the AP subgroups according to the RAC were as follows: MAP ( = 213), MSAP ( = 158), and SAP ( = 50). The NCI had the highest area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve value (0.862), demonstrating severe disease according to BISAP, with a sensitivity of 78.6% and a specificity of 79.8%. Age (OR:1.046), white blood cell count (WBC) (OR:1.141), hematocrit (OR:1.081), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (OR:1.040), and NCI (OR:1.076) were independently associated with severe disease, according to the multivariate analysis results, and were determined as components of the newly developed nomogram. The AUROC of the nomogram (0.891) was superior to the AUROCs of all the components of the nomogram except the NCI. Moreover, the NCI was the only parameter to distinguish MSAP from MAP (OR:1.119, 95% CI: 1.015-1.235, = 0.023) and SAP from MSAP (OR:1.095, 95% CI: 1.031-1.162, = 0.003). : The present study enabled the identification of the neutrophil-creatinine index as a new prognostic tool for the assessment of AP severity at hospital admission.

References
1.
Di M, Liu H, Yang Z, Bonis P, Tang J, Lau J . Prediction Models of Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis in Adults: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2016; 165(7):482-490. DOI: 10.7326/M16-0650. View

2.
Windsor J . Search for prognostic markers for acute pancreatitis. Lancet. 2000; 355(9219):1924-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02317-5. View

3.
Banks P, Bollen T, Dervenis C, Gooszen H, Johnson C, Sarr M . Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2012; 62(1):102-11. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. View

4.
Petejova N, Martinek A . Acute kidney injury following acute pancreatitis: A review. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2013; 157(2):105-13. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2013.048. View

5.
Sui Y, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Li G, Liu L . Fibrinogen-like Protein 1 as a Predictive Marker for the Incidence of Severe Acute Pancreatitis and Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58(12). PMC: 9785826. DOI: 10.3390/medicina58121753. View