» Articles » PMID: 38673796

A Biodegradable Tissue Adhesive for Post-Extraction Alveolar Bone Regeneration Under Ongoing Anticoagulation-A Microstructural Volumetric Analysis in a Rodent Model

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38673796
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In addition to post-extraction bleeding, pronounced alveolar bone resorption is a very common complication after tooth extraction in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy. The novel, biodegenerative, polyurethane adhesive VIVO has shown a positive effect on soft tissue regeneration and hemostasis. However, the regenerative potential of VIVO in terms of bone regeneration has not yet been explored. The present rodent study compared the post-extraction bone healing of a collagen sponge (COSP) and VIVO in the context of ongoing anticoagulation therapy. According to a split-mouth design, a total of 178 extraction sockets were generated under rivaroxaban treatment, of which 89 extraction sockets were treated with VIVO and 89 with COSP. Post-extraction bone analysis was conducted via in vivo micro-computed tomography (µCT), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) after 5, 10, and 90 days. During the observation time of 90 days, µCT analysis revealed that VIVO and COSP led to significant increases in both bone volume and bone density ( ≤ 0.001). SEM images of the extraction sockets treated with either VIVO or COSP showed bone regeneration in the form of lamellar bone mass. Ratios of Ca/C and Ca/P observed via EDX indicated newly formed bone matrixes in both treatments after 90 days. There were no statistical differences between treatment with VIVO or COSP. The hemostatic agents VIVO and COSP were both able to prevent pronounced bone loss, and both demonstrated a strong positive influence on the bone regeneration of the alveolar ridge post-extraction.

References
1.
Berton F, Costantinides F, Stacchi C, Corradini A, Lenarda A, Di Lenarda R . Is L-PRF an effective hemostatic agent in single tooth extractions? A cohort study on VKA and DOAC patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(6):2865-2874. PMC: 10264503. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-04880-z. View

2.
Dang H, Chen W, Chen L, Huo X, Wang F . TPPU inhibits inflammation-induced excessive autophagy to restore the osteogenic differentiation potential of stem cells and improves alveolar ridge preservation. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1574. PMC: 9884285. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28710-0. View

3.
Gu J, Jiao K, Li J, Yan J, Wang K, Wang F . Polyphosphate-crosslinked collagen scaffolds for hemostasis and alveolar bone regeneration after tooth extraction. Bioact Mater. 2022; 15:68-81. PMC: 8940764. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.019. View

4.
Kourkoumelis N, Balatsoukas I, Tzaphlidou M . Ca/P concentration ratio at different sites of normal and osteoporotic rabbit bones evaluated by Auger and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. J Biol Phys. 2013; 38(2):279-91. PMC: 3326148. DOI: 10.1007/s10867-011-9247-3. View

5.
Fukushima K, Tanaka H, Kadaba Srinivasan P, Pawlowsky K, Kogel B, Uemoto S . Hemostatic Efficacy and Safety of the Novel Medical Adhesive, MAR VIVO-107, in a Rabbit Liver Resection Model. Eur Surg Res. 2018; 59(1-2):48-57. DOI: 10.1159/000481818. View