» Articles » PMID: 38673683

Pushing the Limits of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery-From Preoperative to Intraoperative to Postoperative Management

Abstract

The introduction of minimally invasive surgery ushered in a new era of spine surgery by minimizing the undue iatrogenic injury, recovery time, and blood loss, among other complications, of traditional open procedures. Over time, technological advancements have further refined the care of the operative minimally invasive spine patient. Moreover, pre-, and postoperative care have also undergone significant change by way of artificial intelligence risk stratification, advanced imaging for surgical planning and patient selection, postoperative recovery pathways, and digital health solutions. Despite these advancements, challenges persist necessitating ongoing research and collaboration to further optimize patient care in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the role of nursing interventions in enhanced recovery after surgery for minimally invasive spine surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Zhang D, Ding H, Shen C, Liu Y, Jia N Front Surg. 2025; 12:1519135.

PMID: 40046500 PMC: 11880021. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1519135.


Optimizing Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Exoscopic Technology: A Review of Key Innovations.

Quinones C, Wilson J, Kumbhare D, Guthikonda B, Hoang S J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004663 PMC: 11856252. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041132.

References
1.
Liounakos J, Wang M . The Endoscopic Approach to Lumbar Discectomy, Fusion, and Enhanced Recovery: A Review. Global Spine J. 2020; 10(2 Suppl):65S-69S. PMC: 7263329. DOI: 10.1177/2192568219884913. View

2.
Chauhan D, Ahmad H, Subtirelu R, Mannam S, Turlip R, Bryan K . Defining the minimal clinically important difference in smartphone-based mobility after spine surgery: correlation of survey questionnaire to mobility data. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023; 39(3):427-437. DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23336. View

3.
Lee M, Cizik A, Hamilton D, Chapman J . Predicting medical complications after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry. Spine J. 2013; 14(2):291-9. PMC: 4012388. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.043. View

4.
Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Lubelski D, Cottrill E, Schilling A, Ahmed A . Assessing underlying bone quality in spine surgery patients: a narrative review of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and alternatives. Spine J. 2020; 21(2):321-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.08.020. View

5.
Karhade A, Thio Q, Ogink P, Bono C, Ferrone M, Oh K . Predicting 90-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Spinal Metastatic Disease: Development and Internal Validation. Neurosurgery. 2019; 85(4):E671-E681. DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz070. View