» Articles » PMID: 38673678

Antithrombotic Use Patterns in COVID-19 Patients from Spain: A Real-World Data Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38673678
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antithrombotics have been widely used to treat and prevent COVID-19-related thrombosis; however, studies on their use at population levels are limited. We aimed to describe antithrombotic use patterns during the pandemic in Spanish primary care and hospital-admitted patients with COVID-19. A real-world data study was performed. Data were obtained from BIFAP's electronic health records. We investigated the antithrombotic prescriptions made within ±14 days after diagnosis between March 2020 and February 2022, divided their use into prior and new/naive groups, and reported their post-discharge use. We included 882,540 individuals (53.4% women), of whom 78,499 were hospitalized. The median age was 44.7 (IQR 39-59). Antithrombotics were prescribed in 37,183 (4.6%) primary care subjects and 42,041 (53.6%) hospital-admitted patients, of whom 7505 (20.2%) and 20,300 (48.3%), respectively, were naive users. Prior users were older and had more comorbidities than new users. Enoxaparin was the most prescribed antithrombotic in hospitals, with higher prescription rates in new than prior users (2348.2, IQR 2390-3123.1 vs. 1378, IQR 1162-1751.6 prescriptions per 10,000 cases, = 0.002). In primary care, acetylsalicylic acid was the most used antithrombotic, with higher use rates in prior than in naïve users. Post-discharge use occurred in 6686 (15.9%) subjects (median use = 10 days, IQR 9-30). Our study identified a consensus on prescribing antithrombotics in COVID-19 patients, but with low use rates in hospitals.

References
1.
Zong X, Wang X, Liu Y, Li Z, Wang W, Wei D . Antiplatelet therapy for patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:965790. PMC: 9490267. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.965790. View

2.
Macia-Martinez M, Gil M, Huerta C, Martin-Merino E, Alvarez A, Bryant V . Base de Datos para la Investigación Farmacoepidemiológica en Atención Primaria (BIFAP): A data resource for pharmacoepidemiology in Spain. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020; 29(10):1236-1245. DOI: 10.1002/pds.5006. View

3.
Palareti G, Legnani C, Antonucci E, Cosmi B, Poli D, Testa S . D-dimer testing, with gender-specific cutoff levels, is of value to assess the individual risk of venous thromboembolic recurrence in non-elderly patients of both genders: a post hoc analysis of the DULCIS study. Intern Emerg Med. 2019; 15(3):453-462. PMC: 7165144. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-019-02216-y. View

4.
Cuker A, Tseng E, Nieuwlaat R, Angchaisuksiri P, Blair C, Dane K . American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: July 2021 update on postdischarge thromboprophylaxis. Blood Adv. 2021; 6(2):664-671. PMC: 8566097. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005945. View

5.
Nadeem R, Thomas S, Fathima Z, Palathinkal A, Alkilani Y, Dejan E . Pattern of anticoagulation prescription for patients with Covid-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome admitted to ICU. Does it impact outcome?. Heart Lung. 2020; 50(1):1-5. PMC: 7574696. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.10.009. View