» Articles » PMID: 38673058

Fertility Preservation in the Era of Immuno-Oncology: Lights and Shadows

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38673058
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, immuno-oncology has revolutionized the cancer treatment field by harnessing the immune system's power to counteract cancer cells. While this innovative approach holds great promise for improving cancer outcomes, it also raises important considerations related to fertility and reproductive toxicity. In fact, most young females receiving gonadotoxic anti-cancer treatments undergo iatrogenic ovarian exhaustion, resulting in a permanent illness that precludes the vocation of motherhood as a natural female sexual identity. Although commonly used, oocyte cryopreservation for future in vitro fertilization and even ovarian cortex transplantation are considered unsafe procedures in cancer patients due to their oncogenic risks; whereas, ovarian stem cells might support neo-oogenesis, providing a novel stemness model of regenerative medicine for future fertility preservation programs in oncology. Recent scientific evidence has postulated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might in some way reduce fertility by inducing either primary or secondary hypogonadism, whose incidence and mechanisms are not yet known. Therefore, considering the lack of data, it is currently not possible to define the most suitable FP procedure for young patients who are candidates for ICIs. In this report, we will investigate the few available data concerning the molecular regulation of ICI therapy and their resulting gonadal toxicity, to hypothesize the most suitable fertility preservation strategy for patients receiving these drugs.

Citing Articles

The potential role of exercise in mitigating fertility toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients.

Jamrasi P, Tazi M, Zulkifli N, Bae J, Song W J Physiol Sci. 2024; 74(1):57.

PMID: 39616333 PMC: 11607910. DOI: 10.1186/s12576-024-00950-3.

References
1.
Oktay K, Harvey B, Partridge A, Quinn G, Reinecke J, Taylor H . Fertility Preservation in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(19):1994-2001. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.1914. View

2.
Kim A, Nelson A, Stimpert K, Flyckt R, Thirumavalavan N, Baker K . Minding the Bathwater: Fertility and Reproductive Toxicity in the Age of Immuno-Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022; 18(12):815-822. PMC: 10166412. DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00469. View

3.
Telfer E, Grosbois J, Odey Y, Rosario R, Anderson R . Making a good egg: human oocyte health, aging, and in vitro development. Physiol Rev. 2023; 103(4):2623-2677. PMC: 10625843. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2022. View

4.
Kobayashi T, Iwama S, Sugiyama D, Yasuda Y, Okuji T, Ito M . Anti-pituitary antibodies and susceptible human leukocyte antigen alleles as predictive biomarkers for pituitary dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2021; 9(5). PMC: 8137231. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002493. View

5.
Dolmans M, Luyckx V, Donnez J, Andersen C, Greve T . Risk of transferring malignant cells with transplanted frozen-thawed ovarian tissue. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(6):1514-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.027. View