» Articles » PMID: 38672646

Enhancements in Radiological Detection of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Utilizing AI-Assisted Ultrasound Imaging Data and the Lymph Node Reporting and Data System Scale

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38672646
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The paper presents a novel approach for the automatic detection of neoplastic lesions in lymph nodes (LNs). It leverages the latest advances in machine learning (ML) with the LN Reporting and Data System (LN-RADS) scale. By integrating diverse datasets and network structures, the research investigates the effectiveness of ML algorithms in improving diagnostic accuracy and automation potential. Both Multinominal Logistic Regression (MLR)-integrated and fully connected neuron layers are included in the analysis. The methods were trained using three variants of combinations of histopathological data and LN-RADS scale labels to assess their utility. The findings demonstrate that the LN-RADS scale improves prediction accuracy. MLR integration is shown to achieve higher accuracy, while the fully connected neuron approach excels in AUC performance. All of the above suggests a possibility for significant improvement in the early detection and prognosis of cancer using AI techniques. The study underlines the importance of further exploration into combined datasets and network architectures, which could potentially lead to even greater improvements in the diagnostic process.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic accuracy of node-RADS for the detection of lymph node invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lu F, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Feng N Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39878903 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11387-6.


Artificial intelligence performance in ultrasound-based lymph node diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Han X, Qu J, Chui M, Gunda S, Chen Z, Qin J BMC Cancer. 2025; 25(1):73.

PMID: 39806293 PMC: 11726910. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13447-y.

References
1.
Ai Q, So T, Hung K, King A . Normal size of benign upper neck nodes on MRI: parotid, submandibular, occipital, facial, retroauricular and level IIb nodal groups. Cancer Imaging. 2022; 22(1):66. PMC: 9730594. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00504-z. View

2.
Colbert C, Ming Z, Pogosyan A, Finn J, Nguyen K . Comparison of Three Ultrasmall, Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for MRI at 3.0 T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022; 57(6):1819-1829. PMC: 10106532. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28457. View

3.
Baxter N, Virnig D, Rothenberger D, Morris A, Jessurun J, Virnig B . Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97(3):219-25. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji020. View

4.
Sankineni S, Brown A, Fascelli M, Law Y, Pinto P, Choyke P . Lymph node staging in prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2015; 16(5):30. PMC: 6330104. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-015-0505-y. View

5.
Man V, Kwong A . Different strategies in marking axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant medical treatment: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 186(3):607-615. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06118-6. View