» Articles » PMID: 38672541

Predictors for Success and Failure in Transoral Robotic Surgery-A Retrospective Study in the North of the Netherlands

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38672541
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is utilized for treating various malignancies, such as early-stage oropharyngeal cancer and lymph node metastasis of an unknown primary tumor (CUP), and also benign conditions, like obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and chronic lingual tonsillitis. However, the success and failure of TORS have not been analyzed to date. In this retrospective observational multicenter cohort study, we evaluated patients treated with TORS using the da Vinci surgical system. Success criteria were defined as identification of the primary tumor for CUP, >2 mm resection margin for malignant conditions, and improvement on respiratory polygraphy and tonsillitis complaints for benign conditions. A total of 220 interventions in 211 patients were included. We identified predictors of success, such as low comorbidity status ACE-27, positive P16 status, and lower age for CUP, and female gender and OSA severity for benign conditions. For other malignancies, no predictors for success were found. Predictors of failure based on postoperative complications included high comorbidity scores (ASA) and anticoagulant use, and for postoperative pain, younger age and female gender were identified. This study provides valuable insights into the outcomes and predictors of success and failure in TORS procedures across various conditions and may also help in patient selection and counseling.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Extubation Protocols in the Intensive Care Unit Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Recchia A, Cascella M, Copetti M, Barile A, Bignami E, DEcclesia A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39597927 PMC: 11594273. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226786.

References
1.
De Virgilio A, Costantino A, Rizzo D, Crescio C, Gallus R, Spriano G . Do We Have Enough Evidence to Specifically Recommend Transoral Robotic Surgery in HPV-Driven Oropharyngeal Cancer? A Systematic Review. Pathogens. 2023; 12(2). PMC: 9959572. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020160. View

2.
Vicini C, Dallan I, Canzi P, Frassineti S, Nacci A, Seccia V . Transoral robotic surgery of the tongue base in obstructive sleep Apnea-Hypopnea syndrome: anatomic considerations and clinical experience. Head Neck. 2011; 34(1):15-22. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21691. View

3.
Paleri V, Wight R . A cross-comparison of retrospective notes extraction and combined notes extraction and patient interview in the completion of a comorbidity index (ACE-27) in a cohort of United Kingdom patients with head and neck cancer. J Laryngol Otol. 2002; 116(11):937-41. DOI: 10.1258/00222150260369499. View

4.
Seve P, Sawyer M, Hanson J, Broussolle C, Dumontet C, Mackey J . The influence of comorbidities, age, and performance status on the prognosis and treatment of patients with metastatic carcinomas of unknown primary site: a population-based study. Cancer. 2006; 106(9):2058-66. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21833. View

5.
Weinstein G, OMalley Jr B, Magnuson J, Carroll W, Olsen K, Daio L . Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope. 2012; 122(8):1701-7. DOI: 10.1002/lary.23294. View