» Articles » PMID: 38672189

Aging's Effect on Working Memory-Modality Comparison

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38672189
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research exploring the impact of development and aging on working memory (WM) has primarily concentrated on visual and verbal domains, with limited attention paid to the tactile modality. The current study sought to evaluate WM encompassing storage and manipulation across these three modalities, spanning from childhood to old age. The study included 134 participants, divided into four age groups: 7-8, 11-12, 25-35, and 60-69. Each participant completed the Visuospatial Span, Digit Span, and Tactual Span, with forward and backward recall. The findings demonstrated a consistent trend in both forward and backward stages. Performance improved until young adulthood, progressively diminishing with advancing age. In the forward stage, the Tactual Span performance was worse than that of the Digit and Visuospatial Span for all participants. In the backward stage, the Visuospatial Span outperformed the Digit and Tactual Span across all age groups. Furthermore, the Tactual Span backward recall exhibited significantly poorer performance than the other modalities, primarily in the youngest and oldest age groups. In conclusion, age impacts WM differently across modalities, with tactile storage capacity being the most vulnerable. Additionally, tactile manipulation skills develop later in childhood but deteriorate sooner in adulthood, indicating a distinct component within tactile WM.

Citing Articles

Aging Processes of Working Memory in Different Modalities.

Levi O, Heled E Neurol Int. 2024; 16(5):1122-1131.

PMID: 39452686 PMC: 11510651. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16050084.

References
1.
Klingberg T . Development of a superior frontal-intraparietal network for visuo-spatial working memory. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44(11):2171-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.019. View

2.
Heled E, Rotberg S, Yavich R, Hoofien A . Introducing the Tactual Span: A New Task for Assessing Working Memory in the Teactile Modality. Assessment. 2020; 28(3):1018-1031. DOI: 10.1177/1073191120949929. View

3.
Cowan N . The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016; 24(4):1158-1170. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6. View

4.
Salthouse T . What cognitive abilities are involved in trail-making performance?. Intelligence. 2011; 39(4):222-232. PMC: 3141679. DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.001. View

5.
Cohen H, Voss P, Lepore F, Scherzer P . The nature of working memory for Braille. PLoS One. 2010; 5(5):e10833. PMC: 2877075. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010833. View