» Articles » PMID: 38672110

Individualized Multimodal Immunotherapy (IMI): Scientific Rationale and Clinical Experience from a Single Institution

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38672110
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Oncolytic viruses and combinatorial immunotherapy for cancer (this Special Issue) are both part of cancer treatment at IOZK. This review focusses on an individual multimodal cancer immunotherapy concept developed by IOZK, Cologne, Germany. The scientific rationale for employing three main components is explained: (i) oncolytic Newcastle disease virus, (ii) modulated electrohyperthermia and (iii) individual tumor antigen and oncolytic virus modified dendritic cell vaccine (IO-VAC). The strategy involves repeated cancer-immunity cycles evoked in cancer patients by systemic oncolytic virus exposure plus hyperthermia pretreatment to induce immunogenic cell death followed by intradermal IO-VAC vaccination. As an example of the experience at IOZK, we present the latest results from combining the immunotherapy with standard treatment of patients suffering from glioblastoma multiforme. The promising clinical results in terms of overall survival benefit of additional individualized multimodal immunotherapy are presented. The cancer-immunity cycle, as introduced 10 years ago, describes key important steps occurring locally at the sites of both tumor and draining lymph nodes. This view is extended here towards systemic events occuring in blood where immunogenic cell death-induced tumor antigens are transported into the bone marrow. For 20 years it has been known that bone marrow is an antigen-responsive organ in which dendritic cells present tumor antigens to T cells leading to immunological synapse formation, tumor antigen-specific T cell activation and memory T cell formation. Bone marrow is known to be the most prominent source of de novo cellular generation in the body and to play an important role for the storage and maintenance of immunological memory. Its systemic activation is recommended to augment cancer-immunity cycles.

Citing Articles

The Complexity of Malignant Glioma Treatment.

Kampers L, Metselaar D, Vinci M, Scirocchi F, Veldhuijzen van Zanten S, Eyrich M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075726 PMC: 11899524. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050879.

References
1.
Schirrmacher V, Van Gool S, Stuecker W . Breaking Therapy Resistance: An Update on Oncolytic Newcastle Disease Virus for Improvements of Cancer Therapy. Biomedicines. 2019; 7(3). PMC: 6783952. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines7030066. View

2.
Hanahan D, Weinberg R . Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011; 144(5):646-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. View

3.
Ahlert T, Sauerbrei W, Bastert G, Ruhland S, Bartik B, Simiantonaki N . Tumor-cell number and viability as quality and efficacy parameters of autologous virus-modified cancer vaccines in patients with breast or ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15(4):1354-66. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1354. View

4.
Van Gool S, Van de Vliet P, Kampers L, Kosmal J, Sprenger T, Reich E . Methods behind oncolytic virus-based DC vaccines in cancer: Toward a multiphase combined treatment strategy for Glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Methods Cell Biol. 2024; 183:51-113. DOI: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2023.06.001. View

5.
Van Gool S, Makalowski J, Van de Vliet P, Van Gool S, Sprenger T, Schirrmacher V . Individualized Multimodal Immunotherapy for Adults with IDH1 Wild-Type GBM: A Single Institute Experience. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(4). PMC: 9954396. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041194. View