» Articles » PMID: 38670169

Insulin Reference Intervals in Brazilian Adolescents by Direct and Indirect Approaches: Validation of a Data Mining Method from Laboratory Data

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2024 Apr 26
PMID 38670169
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine reference intervals (RI) for fasting blood insulin (FBI) in Brazilian adolescents, 12 to 17 years old, by direct and indirect approaches, and to validate indirectly determined RI.

Methods: Two databases were used for RI determination. Database 1 (DB1), used to obtain RI through a posteriori direct method, consisted of prospectively selected healthy individuals. Database 2 (DB2) was retrospectively mined from an outpatient laboratory information system (LIS) used for the indirect method (Bhattacharya method).

Results: From DB1, 29345 individuals were enrolled (57.65 % female) and seven age ranges and sex partitions were statistically determined according to mean FBI values: females: 12 and 13 years-old, 14 years-old, 15 years-old, 16 and 17 years-old; and males: 12, 13 and 14 years-old, 15 years-old, 16 and 17 years-old. From DB2, 5465 adolescents (67.5 % female) were selected and grouped according to DB1 partitions. The mean FBI level was significantly higher in DB2, on all groups. The RI upper limit (URL) determined by Bhattacharya method was slightly lower than the 90 % CI URL directly obtained on DB1, except for group female 12 and 13 years old. High agreement rates for diagnosing elevated FBI in all groups on DB1 validated indirect RI presented.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that Bhattacharya indirect method to determine FBI RI in adolescents can overcome some of the difficulties and challenges of the direct approach.

References
1.
Henny J, Vassault A, Boursier G, Vukasovic I, Brguljan P, Lohmander M . Recommendation for the review of biological reference intervals in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016; 54(12):1893-1900. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0793. View

2.
Yang D, Su Z, Mu R, Diao Y, Zhang X, Liu Y . Effects of Using Different Indirect Techniques on the Calculation of Reference Intervals: Observational Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e45651. PMC: 10390978. DOI: 10.2196/45651. View

3.
Estey M, Cohen A, Colantonio D, Chan M, Marvasti T, Randell E . CLSI-based transference of the CALIPER database of pediatric reference intervals from Abbott to Beckman, Ortho, Roche and Siemens Clinical Chemistry Assays: direct validation using reference samples from the CALIPER cohort. Clin Biochem. 2013; 46(13-14):1197-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.04.001. View

4.
Ozcurumez M, Haeckel R . Biological variables influencing the estimation of reference limits. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018; 78(5):337-345. DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2018.1471617. View

5.
Colantonio D, Kyriakopoulou L, Chan M, Daly C, Brinc D, Venner A . Closing the gaps in pediatric laboratory reference intervals: a CALIPER database of 40 biochemical markers in a healthy and multiethnic population of children. Clin Chem. 2012; 58(5):854-68. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.177741. View