» Articles » PMID: 38668462

Evaluation of a Proportional Response Addition Approach to Mixture Risk Assessment and Predictive Toxicology Using Data on Four Trihalomethanes from the U.S. EPA's Multiple-Purpose Design Study

Overview
Journal Toxics
Date 2024 Apr 26
PMID 38668462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, proportional response addition (Prop-RA), a model for predicting response from chemical mixture exposure, is demonstrated and evaluated by statistically analyzing data on all possible binary combinations of the four regulated trihalomethanes (THMs). These THMs were the subject of a multipurpose toxicology study specifically designed to evaluate Prop-RA. The experimental design used a set of doses common to all components and mixtures, providing hepatotoxicity data on the four single THMs and the binary combinations. In Prop-RA, the contribution of each component to mixture toxicity is proportional to its fraction in the mixture based on its response at the total mixture dose. The primary analysis consisted of 160 evaluations. Statistically significant departures from the Prop-RA prediction were found for seven evaluations, with three predications that were greater than and four that were less than the predicted response; interaction magnitudes (n-fold difference in response vs. prediction) ranged from 1.3 to 1.4 for the former and 2.6 to 3.8 for the latter. These predictions support the idea that Prop-RA works best with chemicals where the effective dose ranges overlap. Prop-RA does not assume the similarity of toxic action or independence, but it can be applied to a mixture of components that affect the same organ/system, with perhaps unknown toxic modes of action.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Interaction-Based Hazard Index Formula Using Data on Four Trihalomethanes from U.S. EPA's Multiple-Purpose Design Study.

Hertzberg R, Teuschler L, McDonald A, Sey Y, Simmons J Toxics. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38787084 PMC: 11125920. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12050305.

References
1.
Crofton K, Craft E, Hedge J, Gennings C, Simmons J, Carchman R . Thyroid-hormone-disrupting chemicals: evidence for dose-dependent additivity or synergism. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(11):1549-54. PMC: 1310917. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8195. View

2.
Hertzberg R, Teuschler L . Evaluating quantitative formulas for dose-response assessment of chemical mixtures. Environ Health Perspect. 2003; 110 Suppl 6:965-70. PMC: 1241279. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110s6965. View

3.
Cedergreen N . Quantifying synergy: a systematic review of mixture toxicity studies within environmental toxicology. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e96580. PMC: 4008607. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096580. View

4.
Tan Y, Clewell H, Campbell J, Andersen M . Evaluating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with computational models in supporting cumulative risk assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011; 8(5):1613-30. PMC: 3108131. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8051613. View

5.
Teuschler L, Hertzberg R, Rice G, Simmons J . EPA project-level research strategies for chemical mixtures: targeted research for meaningful results. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011; 18(3):193-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2003.12.005. View