» Articles » PMID: 38668015

Heat Treatment's Vital Role: Elevating Orthodontic Mini-Implants for Superior Performance and Longevity-Pilot Study

Abstract

Material And Methods: Ten self-drilling mini-implants sourced from two distinct manufacturers (Jeil Medical Corporation and Leone) with dimensions of 2.0 mm diameter and 10 mm length were tested. They were separated into two material groups: Ti6Al4V and 316L. Using the CETRUMT-2 microtribometer equipment, indentation testing was conducted employing a diamond-tipped Rockwell penetrator at a constant force of 4.5 N.

Results: Slight differences were observed in the elastic modulus of the Ti6Al4V alloy (103.99 GPa) and stainless steel 316L (203.20 GPa) compared to natural bone. The higher elastic moduli of these materials indicate that they are stiffer, which could potentially lead to stress-shielding phenomena and bone resorption. Heat treatment resulted in significant changes in mechanical properties, including elastic modulus reductions of approximately 26.14% for Ti6Al4V and 24.82% for 316L, impacting their performance in orthodontic applications.

Conclusion: Understanding the effects of heat treatment on these alloys is crucial for optimizing their biomechanical compatibility and longevity in orthodontic treatment. To fully evaluate the effects of heat treatment on mini-implants and to refine their design and efficacy in clinical practice, further research is needed.

Citing Articles

Balancing the Load: How Optimal Forces Shape the Longevity and Stability of Orthodontic Mini-Implants.

Panaite T, Savin C, Olteanu N, Romanec C, Vieriu R, Balcos C Dent J (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39996945 PMC: 11854790. DOI: 10.3390/dj13020071.

References
1.
Dallago M, Fontanari V, Torresani E, Leoni M, Pederzolli C, Potrich C . Fatigue and biological properties of Ti-6Al-4V ELI cellular structures with variously arranged cubic cells made by selective laser melting. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017; 78:381-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.044. View

2.
Zysset P . Indentation of bone tissue: a short review. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 20(6):1049-55. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-0854-9. View

3.
Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, Drescher D . Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 2011; 33(4):396-401. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq151. View

4.
Guo Y, Chen D, Cheng M, Lu W, Wang L, Zhang X . The bone tissue compatibility of a new Ti35Nb2Ta3Zr alloy with a low Young's modulus. Int J Mol Med. 2013; 31(3):689-97. DOI: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1249. View

5.
Mierzejewska Z, Hudak R, Sidun J . Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of DMLS Ti6Al4V Alloy Dedicated to Biomedical Applications. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12(1). PMC: 6337110. DOI: 10.3390/ma12010176. View