» Articles » PMID: 38667987

Subjective Straylight Index: A Visual Test for Retinal Contrast Assessment As a Function of Veiling Glare

Overview
Journal J Imaging
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Apr 26
PMID 38667987
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Spatial aspects of visual performance are usually evaluated through visual acuity charts and contrast sensitivity (CS) tests. CS tests are generated by vanishing the contrast level of the visual charts. However, the quality of retinal images can be affected by both ocular aberrations and scattering effects and none of those factors are incorporated as parameters in visual tests in clinical practice. We propose a new computational methodology to generate visual acuity charts affected by ocular scattering effects. The generation of glare effects on the visual tests is reached by combining an ocular straylight meter methodology with the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage's (CIE) general disability glare formula. A new function for retinal contrast assessment is proposed, the subjective straylight function (SSF), which provides the maximum tolerance to the perception of straylight in an observed visual acuity test. Once the SSF is obtained, the subjective straylight index (SSI) is defined as the area under the SSF curve. Results report the normal values of the SSI in a population of 30 young healthy subjects (19 ± 1 years old), a peak centered at SSI = 0.46 of a normal distribution was found. SSI was also evaluated as a function of both spatial and temporal aspects of vision. Ocular wavefront measures revealed a statistical correlation of the SSI with defocus and trefoil terms. In addition, the time recovery (TR) after induced total disability glare and the SSI were related; in particular, the higher the RT, the greater the SSI value for high- and mid-contrast levels of the visual test. No relationships were found for low contrast visual targets. To conclude, a new computational method for retinal contrast assessment as a function of ocular straylight was proposed as a complementary subjective test for visual function performance.

References
1.
Xiao N, Xu S, Li Z, Tang M, Mao R, Yang T . A single photoreceptor splits perception and entrainment by cotransmission. Nature. 2023; 623(7987):562-570. PMC: 10651484. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06681-6. View

2.
Ungewiss J, Schiefer U, Eichinger P, Worner M, Crabb D, Jones P . Does intraocular straylight predict night driving visual performance? Correlations between straylight levels and contrast sensitivity, halo size, and hazard recognition distance with and without glare. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022; 16:910620. PMC: 9514855. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.910620. View

3.
Martinez-Roda J, Vilaseca M, Ondategui J, Giner A, Burgos F, Cardona G . Optical quality and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population. Clin Exp Optom. 2010; 94(2):223-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00535.x. View

4.
Rosenkranz S, Kaulen B, Zimmermann H, Bittner A, Dorr M, Stellmann J . Validation of Computer-Adaptive Contrast Sensitivity as a Tool to Assess Visual Impairment in Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:591302. PMC: 7940823. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.591302. View

5.
Franssen L, Coppens J, van den Berg T . Compensation comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(2):768-76. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0690. View