» Articles » PMID: 38667695

Comprehensive Evaluation of Injectability Attributes in OxiFree™ Dermal Fillers: MaiLi Product Variants and Clinical Case Reports

Overview
Journal Gels
Date 2024 Apr 26
PMID 38667695
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dermal filler injectability is a critical factor for commercial product adoption by medical aesthetic professionals and for successful clinical administration. We have previously reported (in vitro and ex vivo) cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA)-based dermal filler benchmarking in terms of manual and automated injectability requirements. To further enhance the function-oriented product characterization workflows and the clinical relevance of dermal filler injectability assessments, the aim of this study was to perform in vivo evaluations. Therefore, several variants of the MaiLi product range (OxiFree™ technology) were characterized in vitro and in vivo in terms of injectability attributes, with a focus on hydrogel system homogeneity and ease of injection. Firstly, standardized in vitro assays were performed in SimSkin cutaneous equivalents, with variations of the clinical injector, injection site, and injection technique. Then, automated injections in SimSkin cutaneous equivalents were comparatively performed in a texture analysis setup to obtain fine-granulometry injection force profile results. Finally, five female participants were recruited for the in vivo arm of the study (case reports), with variations of the clinical injector, injection site, and injection technique. Generally, the obtained quantitative force values and injection force profiles were critically appraised from a translational viewpoint, based on discussions around the OxiFree™ manufacturing technology and on in-use specialized clinician feedback. Overall, the present study outlined a notable level of homogeneity across the MaiLi product range in terms of injectability attributes, as well as consistently high ease of administration by medical aesthetic clinicians.

Citing Articles

Preparation and Rheological Evaluation of Thiol-Maleimide/Thiol-Thiol Double Self-Crosslinking Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogels as Dermal Fillers for Aesthetic Medicine.

Chu C, Cheng W, Wen B, Liang Y, Sheu M, Chen L Gels. 2024; 10(12).

PMID: 39727534 PMC: 11675831. DOI: 10.3390/gels10120776.

References
1.
Ginter A, Lee T, Woodward J . How Much Does Filler Apparatus Influence Ease of Injection (and Hence, Potential Safety)?. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 39(1):76-80. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002247. View

2.
Della Volpe C, Andrac L, Casanova D, Legre R, Magalon G . [Skin diversity: histological study of 140 skin residues, adapted to plastic surgery]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2012; 57(5):423-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2012.07.001. View

3.
Cotofana S, Hamade H, Bertucci V, Fagien S, Green J, Pavicic T . Change in Rheologic Properties of Facial Soft-Tissue Fillers across the Physiologic Angular Frequency Spectrum. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 148(2):320-331. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008188. View

4.
Hintze V, Schnabelrauch M, Rother S . Chemical Modification of Hyaluronan and Their Biomedical Applications. Front Chem. 2022; 10:830671. PMC: 8873528. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.830671. View

5.
La Gatta A, Schiraldi C, Zaccaria G, Cassuto D . Hyaluronan Dermal Fillers: Efforts Towards a Wider Biophysical Characterization and the Correlation of the Biophysical Parameters to the Clinical Outcome. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2020; 13:87-97. PMC: 6995295. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S220227. View