» Articles » PMID: 38665229

Contact Pressure-guided Wearable Dual-channel Bioimpedance Device for Continuous Hemodynamic Monitoring

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 26
PMID 38665229
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wearable devices for continuous monitoring of arterial pulse waves have the potential to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of cardiovascular diseases. These pulse wave signals are often affected by the contact pressure between the wearable device and the skin, limiting the accuracy and reliability of hemodynamic parameter quantification. Here, we report a continuous hemodynamic monitoring device that enables the simultaneous recording of dual-channel bioimpedance and quantification of pulse wave velocity (PWV) used to calculate blood pressure (BP). Our investigations demonstrate the effect of contact pressure on bioimpedance and PWV. The pulsatile bioimpedance magnitude reached its maximum when the contact pressure approximated the mean arterial pressure of the subject. We employed PWV to continuously quantify BP while maintaining comfortable contact pressure for prolonged wear. The mean absolute error and standard deviation of the error compared to the reference value were determined to be 0.1 ± 3.3 mmHg for systolic BP, 1.3 ± 3.7 mmHg for diastolic BP, and -0.4 ± 3.0 mmHg for mean arterial pressure when measurements were conducted in the lying down position. This research demonstrates the potential of wearable dual-bioimpedance sensors with contact pressure guidance for reliable and continuous hemodynamic monitoring.

Citing Articles

Exploration of the Conditions for Occurrence of Photoplethysmographic Signal Inversion above the Dorsalis Pedis Artery.

Jerve F, Hjelme D, Kalvoy H, Allen J, Tronstad C Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(20).

PMID: 39459987 PMC: 11511109. DOI: 10.3390/s24206505.

References
1.
Cohen J, Pignanelli C, Burr J . The Effect of Body Position on Measures of Arterial Stiffness in Humans. J Vasc Res. 2020; 57(3):143-151. DOI: 10.1159/000506351. View

2.
Albert N . Bioimpedance cardiography measurements of cardiac output and other cardiovascular parameters. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2006; 18(2):195-202, x. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2006.01.008. View

3.
Namkoong M, Baskar B, Singh L, Guo H, McMurray J, Branan K . Add-on soft electronic interfaces for continuous cuffless blood pressure monitoring. Adv Mater Technol. 2023; 8(15). PMC: 10495086. DOI: 10.1002/admt.202300158. View

4.
Anand G, Yu Y, Lowe A, Kalra A . Bioimpedance analysis as a tool for hemodynamic monitoring: overview, methods and challenges. Physiol Meas. 2021; 42(3). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/abe80e. View

5.
Wang H, Wang L, Sun N, Yao Y, Hao L, Xu L . Quantitative Comparison of the Performance of Piezoresistive, Piezoelectric, Acceleration, and Optical Pulse Wave Sensors. Front Physiol. 2020; 10:1563. PMC: 6971205. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01563. View