» Articles » PMID: 38662646

Maternal Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization Prevalence in the United States

Overview
Journal Blood Adv
Specialty Hematology
Date 2024 Apr 25
PMID 38662646
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a life-threatening disease mediated by maternal alloimmunization to red blood cell (RBC) antigens. Studies of maternal alloimmunization prevalence in the United States lack national data. This study describes prevalence and trends in alloimmunization in pregnancy in the United States. RBC antibodies (abs) were identified in a large, nationwide, commercial laboratory database from 2010 through 2021. The cohort comprised pregnancies for which the year of laboratory collection and patient's state of residence were available. Data were normalized based on US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates of live births and weighted by year and US Census Division. Cochrane-Armitage tests assessed temporal trends of alloimmunization. Of 9 876 196 pregnancies, 147 262 (1.5%) screened positive for RBC abs, corresponding to an estimated prevalence of 1518 of 100 000 pregnancies. Of identified RBC abs, anti-D comprised 64.1% pregnancies (586/100 000). Prevalence of other high-risk RBC abs for HDFN included anti-K (68/100 000) and anti-c (29/100 000). Incidence of all 3 high-risk abs increased from 2010 to 2021 (all P < .001). Among almost 10 million pregnancies in the United States, comprising an estimated 14.4% of all pregnancies, 1.5% screened positive for RBC abs. Almost three-quarters (679/100 000 [74.3%]) of RBC abs identified were high risk for HDFN. Although prevalence of anti-D is difficult to interpret without the ability to distinguish alloimmunization from passive immunity, it remains problematic in HDFN, ranking second only to anti-K in critical titers. Given the sequelae of HDFN, new initiatives are required to reduce the incidence of alloimmunization in patients of reproductive potential.

Citing Articles

Characterization of severity of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to Rhesus antigen alloimmunization.

Krumme A, Suruki R, Blacketer C, Hardin J, Swerdel J, Tjoa M AJOG Glob Rep. 2025; 5(1):100439.

PMID: 40034827 PMC: 11872512. DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100439.


Current state and potential applications of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors in hematologic conditions.

Jacobs J, Booth G, Raza S, Clark L, Fasano R, Gavriilaki E Am J Hematol. 2024; 99(12):2351-2366.

PMID: 39324647 PMC: 11560617. DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27487.


Standard Compared With Extended Red Blood Cell Antigen Matching for Prevention of Subsequent Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn: A Systematic Review.

Sugrue R, Olsen J, Abi Antoun M, Skalla L, Cate J, James A Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 144(4):444-453.

PMID: 39116441 PMC: 11499014. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005701.

References
1.
Lin Y, Saskin A, Wells R, Lenis M, Mamedov A, Callum J . Prophylactic RhCE and Kell antigen matching: impact on alloimmunization in transfusion-dependent patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Vox Sang. 2017; 112(1):79-86. DOI: 10.1111/vox.12455. View

2.
Pal M, Williams B . Prevalence of maternal red cell alloimmunisation: a population study from Queensland, Australia. Pathology. 2015; 47(2):151-5. DOI: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000225. View

3.
Moinuddin I, Fletcher C, Millward P . Prevalence and specificity of clinically significant red cell alloantibodies in pregnant women - a study from a tertiary care hospital in Southeast Michigan. J Blood Med. 2019; 10:283-289. PMC: 6708388. DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S214118. View

4.
Goel R, Zhu X, Patel E, Crowe E, Ness P, Katz L . Blood transfusion trends in the United States: national inpatient sample, 2015 to 2018. Blood Adv. 2021; 5(20):4179-4184. PMC: 8945622. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005361. View

5.
Bollason G, Hjartardottir H, Jonsson T, Gudmundsson S, Kjartansson S, Halldorsdottir A . Red blood cell alloimmunization in pregnancy during the years 1996-2015 in Iceland: a nation-wide population study. Transfusion. 2017; 57(11):2578-2585. DOI: 10.1111/trf.14262. View